Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Message-ID: <b97221e1-dd43-e2e0-5c37-f86162768f00@microchip.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 18:00:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.8.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: configs: enable support for Kontron KSwitch D10
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
CC:     Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
        Horatiu Vultur - M31836 <Horatiu.Vultur@microchip.com>
References: <20220518141542.531148-1-michael@walle.cc>
 <CAK8P3a01B2uEP7=AkVBG5FYdfMHyReFP=120Ay3+s2EV9kO5Uw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Organization: microchip
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a01B2uEP7=AkVBG5FYdfMHyReFP=120Ay3+s2EV9kO5Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Arnd, Michael,

On 18/05/2022 at 16:52, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 3:15 PM Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
>>
>> The Kontron KSwitch D10 is based on a Microchip LAN9668 SoC. It is a
>> managed ethernet network switch with either 8 copper ports or 6 copper
>> ports and 2 SFP cages.
>>
>> Enable all required kconfig symbols, either as module where possible or
>> compiled-in where it is not possible.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>

Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>

>> ---
>> FWIW, there will be a board in our lab in KernelCI using this config.
> 
> The patch looks ok to me, but normally I'd expect it to go through the
> platform maintainer tree unless there is a reason not to. Adding the at91
> maintainers to Cc here.
> 
> It's also a bit late for 5.19, but if everyone agrees, I can add the patch
> to the arm/late branch.

If it's possible for you Arnd, I do agree that you take it in the 
arm/late branch.

Thanks, best regards,
   Nicolas

-- 
Nicolas Ferre