Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 19 May 2022 03:50:55 +0530
From:   Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To:     Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>,
        Joe Stringer <joe@cilium.io>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/17] selftests/bpf: add tests for
 bpf_hid_hw_request
Message-ID: <20220518222055.zh7hvexbqlctvotw@apollo.legion>
References: <20220518205924.399291-1-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
 <20220518205924.399291-13-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220518205924.399291-13-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 02:29:19AM IST, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> Add tests for the newly implemented function.
> We test here only the GET_REPORT part because the other calls are pure
> HID protocol and won't infer the result of the test of the bpf hook.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
>
> ---
>
> changes in v5:
> - use the new hid_bpf_allocate_context() API
> - remove the need for ctx_in for syscall TEST_RUN
>
> changes in v3:
> - use the new hid_get_data API
> - directly use HID_FEATURE_REPORT and HID_REQ_GET_REPORT from uapi
>
> changes in v2:
> - split the series by bpf/libbpf/hid/selftests and samples
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c      |  59 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c
> index 47bc0a30c275..54c0a0fcd54d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c
> @@ -77,12 +77,23 @@ static unsigned char rdesc[] = {
>  	0xc0,			/* END_COLLECTION */
>  };
>
> +static u8 feature_data[] = { 1, 2 };
> +
>  struct attach_prog_args {
>  	int prog_fd;
>  	unsigned int hid;
>  	int retval;
>  };
>
> +struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args {
> +	__u8 data[10];
> +	unsigned int hid;
> +	int retval;
> +	size_t size;
> +	enum hid_report_type type;
> +	__u8 request_type;
> +};
> +
>  static pthread_mutex_t uhid_started_mtx = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
>  static pthread_cond_t uhid_started = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
>
> @@ -142,7 +153,7 @@ static void destroy(int fd)
>
>  static int uhid_event(int fd)
>  {
> -	struct uhid_event ev;
> +	struct uhid_event ev, answer;
>  	ssize_t ret;
>
>  	memset(&ev, 0, sizeof(ev));
> @@ -183,6 +194,15 @@ static int uhid_event(int fd)
>  		break;
>  	case UHID_GET_REPORT:
>  		fprintf(stderr, "UHID_GET_REPORT from uhid-dev\n");
> +
> +		answer.type = UHID_GET_REPORT_REPLY;
> +		answer.u.get_report_reply.id = ev.u.get_report.id;
> +		answer.u.get_report_reply.err = ev.u.get_report.rnum == 1 ? 0 : -EIO;
> +		answer.u.get_report_reply.size = sizeof(feature_data);
> +		memcpy(answer.u.get_report_reply.data, feature_data, sizeof(feature_data));
> +
> +		uhid_write(fd, &answer);
> +
>  		break;
>  	case UHID_SET_REPORT:
>  		fprintf(stderr, "UHID_SET_REPORT from uhid-dev\n");
> @@ -391,6 +411,7 @@ static int open_hidraw(int dev_id)
>  struct test_params {
>  	struct hid *skel;
>  	int hidraw_fd;
> +	int hid_id;
>  };
>
>  static int prep_test(int dev_id, const char *prog_name, struct test_params *test_data)
> @@ -419,27 +440,33 @@ static int prep_test(int dev_id, const char *prog_name, struct test_params *test
>  	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(hid_skel, "hid_skel_open"))
>  		goto cleanup;
>
> -	prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(*hid_skel->skeleton->obj, prog_name);
> -	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "find_prog_by_name"))
> -		goto cleanup;
> +	if (prog_name) {
> +		prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(*hid_skel->skeleton->obj, prog_name);
> +		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "find_prog_by_name"))
> +			goto cleanup;
>
> -	bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true);
> +		bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true);
>
> -	err = hid__load(hid_skel);
> -	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_skel_load"))
> -		goto cleanup;
> +		err = hid__load(hid_skel);
> +		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_skel_load"))
> +			goto cleanup;
>
> -	attach_fd = bpf_program__fd(hid_skel->progs.attach_prog);
> -	if (!ASSERT_GE(attach_fd, 0, "locate attach_prog")) {
> -		err = attach_fd;
> -		goto cleanup;
> -	}
> +		attach_fd = bpf_program__fd(hid_skel->progs.attach_prog);
> +		if (!ASSERT_GE(attach_fd, 0, "locate attach_prog")) {
> +			err = attach_fd;
> +			goto cleanup;
> +		}
>
> -	args.prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog);
> -	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(attach_fd, &tattr);
> -	snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "attach_hid(%s)", prog_name);
> -	if (!ASSERT_EQ(args.retval, 0, buf))
> -		goto cleanup;
> +		args.prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog);
> +		err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(attach_fd, &tattr);
> +		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "attach_hid(%s)", prog_name);
> +		if (!ASSERT_EQ(args.retval, 0, buf))
> +			goto cleanup;
> +	} else {
> +		err = hid__load(hid_skel);
> +		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_skel_load"))
> +			goto cleanup;
> +	}
>
>  	hidraw_fd = open_hidraw(dev_id);
>  	if (!ASSERT_GE(hidraw_fd, 0, "open_hidraw"))
> @@ -447,6 +474,7 @@ static int prep_test(int dev_id, const char *prog_name, struct test_params *test
>
>  	test_data->skel = hid_skel;
>  	test_data->hidraw_fd = hidraw_fd;
> +	test_data->hid_id = hid_id;
>
>  	return 0;
>
> @@ -693,6 +721,54 @@ static int test_hid_change_report(int uhid_fd, int dev_id)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * Attach hid_user_raw_request to the given uhid device,
> + * call the bpf program from userspace
> + * check that the program is called and does the expected.
> + */
> +static int test_hid_user_raw_request_call(int uhid_fd, int dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct test_params params;
> +	int err, prog_fd;
> +	int ret = -1;
> +	struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args args = {
> +		.retval = -1,
> +		.type = HID_FEATURE_REPORT,
> +		.request_type = HID_REQ_GET_REPORT,
> +		.size = 10,
> +	};
> +	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, tattrs,
> +			    .ctx_in = &args,
> +			    .ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
> +	);
> +
> +	err = prep_test(dev_id, NULL, &params);
> +	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "prep_test()"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	args.hid = params.hid_id;
> +	args.data[0] = 1; /* report ID */
> +
> +	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(params.skel->progs.hid_user_raw_request);
> +
> +	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &tattrs);
> +	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	if (!ASSERT_EQ(args.retval, 2, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts_retval"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	if (!ASSERT_EQ(args.data[1], 2, "hid_user_raw_request_check_in"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	ret = 0;
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	cleanup_test(&params);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  void serial_test_hid_bpf(void)
>  {
>  	int err, uhid_fd;
> @@ -720,6 +796,8 @@ void serial_test_hid_bpf(void)
>  	ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_attach_detach");
>  	err = test_hid_change_report(uhid_fd, dev_id);
>  	ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_change_report");
> +	err = test_hid_user_raw_request_call(uhid_fd, dev_id);
> +	ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_change_report");
>
>  	destroy(uhid_fd);
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c
> index ee7529c47ad8..e3444d444303 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,13 @@ extern __u8 *hid_bpf_get_data(struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx,
>  			      unsigned int offset,
>  			      const size_t __sz) __ksym;
>  extern int hid_bpf_attach_prog(unsigned int hid_id, int prog_fd, u32 flags) __ksym;
> +extern struct hid_bpf_ctx *hid_bpf_allocate_context(unsigned int hid_id) __ksym;
> +extern void hid_bpf_release_context(struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx) __ksym;
> +extern int hid_bpf_hw_request(struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx,
> +			      __u8 *data,
> +			      size_t len,
> +			      enum hid_report_type type,
> +			      int reqtype) __ksym;
>
>  struct attach_prog_args {
>  	int prog_fd;
> @@ -56,3 +63,55 @@ int attach_prog(struct attach_prog_args *ctx)
>  					  0);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args {
> +	/* data needs to come at offset 0 so we can do a memcpy into it */
> +	__u8 data[10];
> +	unsigned int hid;
> +	int retval;
> +	size_t size;
> +	enum hid_report_type type;
> +	__u8 request_type;
> +};
> +
> +SEC("syscall")
> +int hid_user_raw_request(struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args *args)
> +{
> +	struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx;
> +	int i, ret = 0;
> +	__u8 *data;
> +
> +	ctx = hid_bpf_allocate_context(args->hid);
> +	if (!ctx)
> +		return 0; /* EPERM check */
> +
> +	/* We can not use the context data memory directly in the hid_bpf call,
> +	 * so we rely on the PTR_TO_MEM allocated in the hid_bpf_context
> +	 */
> +	data = hid_bpf_get_data(ctx, 0 /* offset */, 10 /* size */);
> +	if (!data)
> +		goto out; /* EPERM check */
> +

If I'm reading this right, you need more than just returning PTR_TO_MEM. Since
this points into allocated ctx, nothing prevents user from accessing data after
we do hid_bpf_release_context.

The ref_obj_id of ctx needs to be transferred to R0.ref_obj_id, and R0.id needs
to be assigned another id distinct from the ref_obj_id.

My idea would be to give this type of function a new set, and handle this case
of transferring ref_obj_id into R0. See is_ptr_cast_function in verifier.c.
Shouldn't be too much code. You could even use the bpf_kfunc_arg_meta to store
the ref_obj_id (and ensure only one referenced register exists among the 5
arguments).

> +	__builtin_memcpy(data, args->data, sizeof(args->data));
> +
> +	if (args->size <= sizeof(args->data)) {
> +		ret = hid_bpf_hw_request(ctx,
> +					 data,
> +					 args->size,
> +					 args->type,
> +					 args->request_type);
> +		args->retval = ret;
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto out;
> +	} else {
> +		ret = -7; /* -E2BIG */
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	__builtin_memcpy(args->data, data, sizeof(args->data));
> +
> + out:
> +	hid_bpf_release_context(ctx);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> --
> 2.36.1
>

--
Kartikeya