Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 19 May 2022 00:02:48 +0100
From:   Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc:     dan.carpenter@oracle.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        krzk+dt@kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        mturquette@baylibre.com, paul@crapouillou.net, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        tsbogend@alpha.franken.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] clk: ingenic-tcu: Fix missing TCU clock for X1000
 SoCs
Message-ID: <YoV7GKiaosmX6QnQ@localhost>
References: <20220412122750.279058-1-aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
 <20220412122750.279058-3-aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
 <20220518204734.89090C34113@smtp.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220518204734.89090C34113@smtp.kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 01:47:32PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Aidan MacDonald (2022-04-12 05:27:50)
> > The TCU clock gate on X1000 wasn't requested by the driver and could
> > be gated automatically later on in boot, which prevents timers from
> > running and breaks PWM.
> > 
> > Add a workaround to support old device trees that don't specify the
> > "tcu" clock gate. In this case the kernel will print a warning and
> > attempt to continue without the clock, which is wrong, but it could
> > work if "clk_ignore_unused" is in the kernel arguments.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
> > ---
> 
> Can I take just this one patch through clk tree without the dts part?
> dts snippets go through soc trees.

Yeah. The patches can go through in any order but they both need to be
merged to fix the bug -- each on its own should not change any behavior.

Regards,
Aidan