Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:07:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:07:40 -0500 Received: from hera.cwi.nl ([192.16.191.1]:9384 "EHLO hera.cwi.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:07:24 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 16:37:16 +0100 From: Andries Brouwer To: Kai Germaschewski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: "SubmittingPatches" text Message-ID: <20001117163716.A29847@veritas.com> In-Reply-To: <200011162132.PAA01944@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from kai@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de on Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 09:30:13AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 09:30:13AM +0100, Kai Germaschewski wrote: > One question comes to my mind: Are patches supposed to be applied with > patch -p0 or patch -p1? Suppose the kernel tree is in /kernpath, starting with /kernpath/linux. Linus' patches can be applied by (cd /kernpath; patch -p0 -s < patch) while Alan's patches only work if you do (cd /kernpath/linux; patch -p1 -s < ../patch) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/