Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to
 passive governor
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     johnson.wang@mediatek.com, mka@chromium.org, wenst@chromium.org,
        jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com, andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com,
        hsinyi@chromium.org, saravanak@google.com,
        myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Organization: Samsung Electronics
Message-ID: <03d9b2db-2860-8eb6-65c3-df9f985ce8c0@samsung.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 May 2022 09:44:26 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101
        Thunderbird/59.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <59f53724-87fe-97b8-0660-dcb1a5b464fe@samsung.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
CMS-TYPE: 101P
DLP-Filter: Pass
References: <CGME20220517085446epcas1p4c07ab7d3b80d62c0093c3a45484eae97@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
        <20220517092108.31680-1-cw00.choi@samsung.com>
        <59f53724-87fe-97b8-0660-dcb1a5b464fe@samsung.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Marek,


I send the previous mail without detailed my reply
because of my mistake.

Thanks for the report.
I fix this issue as following: I'll send patch. Thanks.

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
index 7306e943a234..72c67979ebe1 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static int devfreq_passive_event_handler(struct devfreq *devfreq,
 {
 	struct devfreq_passive_data *p_data
 			= (struct devfreq_passive_data *)devfreq->data;
-	int ret = -EINVAL;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!p_data)
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.17.1


On 5/18/22 7:56 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 17.05.2022 11:21, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> The devfreq passive governor has already supported the devfreq parent device
>> for coupling the frequency change if some hardware have the constraints
>> such as power sharing and so on.
>>
>> Add cpu based scaling support to passive governor with required-opp property.
>> It uses the cpufreq notifier to catch the frequency change timing of cpufreq
>> and get the next frequency according to new cpu frequency by using required-opp
>> property. It is based on patch[1] and then just code clean-up by myself.
>>
>> Make the common code for both passive_devfreq and passive_cpufreq
>> parent type to remove the duplicate code.
> 
> I've just tested it on Exynos based boards and on all I see the 
> following issues after system suspend/resume cycle:
> 
> # time rtcwake -s10 -mmem
> rtcwake: wakeup from "mem" using /dev/rtc0 at Wed May 18 11:13:16 2022
> PM: suspend entry (deep)
> Filesystems sync: 0.001 seconds
> Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.002 seconds) done.
> OOM killer disabled.
> Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.002 seconds) done.
> 
> ...
> 
> devfreq soc:bus-disp1-fimd: failed to suspend devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-jpeg-apb: failed to suspend devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-jpeg: failed to suspend devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-g2d-acp: failed to suspend devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-g2d: failed to suspend devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-peri: failed to suspend devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-gen: failed to suspend devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-mfc: failed to suspend devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-fsys2: failed to suspend devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-fsys-apb: failed to suspend devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-noc: failed to suspend devfreq device
> ...
> Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
> Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
> ...
> devfreq soc:bus-mscl: failed to resume devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-gscl-scaler: failed to resume devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-disp1: failed to resume devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-disp1-fimd: failed to resume devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-jpeg-apb: failed to resume devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-jpeg: failed to resume devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-g2d-acp: failed to resume devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-g2d: failed to resume devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-peri: failed to resume devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-gen: failed to resume devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-mfc: failed to resume devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-fsys2: failed to resume devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-fsys-apb: failed to resume devfreq device
> devfreq soc:bus-noc: failed to resume devfreq device
> 
> Some boards (like Trats2) after suspend/resume cycle reveals random crashes.
> 
> All those issues were not observed before applying this patchset.
> 
>> [1] [RFC,v2] PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive_governor
>> - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1101049/
>>
>> Changes from v4:
>> : https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/cover/20220511093554.17535-1-cw00.choi@samsung.com/
>> - Fix issue[2] reported by Marek Szyprowski
>> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/20220511093554.17535-3-cw00.choi@samsung.com/
>>
>> Changes from v3:
>> : ttps://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/cover/20220509120337.92472-1-cw00.choi@samsung.com/
>> - Add tested-by tag of both Chen-Yu Tsai and Johnson Wang
>> - Fix some typo
>>
>> Changes from v2:
>> : https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/cover/20220507150145.531864-1-cw00.choi@samsung.com/
>> - Drop the following patch ("PM / devfreq: passive: Update frequency when start governor")
>> - Move p_data->this initialization into cpufreq_passive_regiser_notifier()
>>
>> Changes from v1:
>> : https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/cover/20210617060546.26933-1-cw00.choi@samsung.com/
>> - Rename cpu_data variable to parent_cpu_data to avoid build fail
>> - Use for_each_possible_cpu macro when register cpufreq transition notifier
>> - Add missing exception handling when cpufreq_passive_register_notifier is failed
>> - Keep cpufreq_policy for posible cpus instead of NR_CPU in order to avoid
>>    the memory waste when NR_CPU is too high.
>> - Add reviewed-by tag of Matthias Kaehlcke for patch1
>>
>> Chanwoo Choi (3):
>>    PM / devfreq: Export devfreq_get_freq_range symbol within devfreq
>>    PM / devfreq: passive: Reduce duplicate code when passive_devfreq case
>>    PM / devfreq: passive: Keep cpufreq_policy for possible cpus
>>
>> Saravana Kannan (1):
>>    PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive governor
>>
>>   drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c          |  20 +-
>>   drivers/devfreq/governor.h         |  27 ++
>>   drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c | 403 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>   include/linux/devfreq.h            |  17 +-
>>   4 files changed, 389 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>>
> Best regards
> 


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics