Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 19 May 2022 05:08:35 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20220518223815.809858-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220519050835.ebpiukexgiys6t57@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20220518223815.809858-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: provide reclaim stats via 'memory.reclaim'
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To:     Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
        Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 04:08:15AM +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
> [1] Provides a way for user-space to trigger proactive reclaim by introducing
> a write-only memcg file 'memory.reclaim'. However reclaim stats like number
> of pages scanned and reclaimed is still not directly available to the
> user-space.
> 
> This patch proposes to extend [1] to make the memcg file 'memory.reclaim'
> readable which returns the number of pages scanned / reclaimed during the
> reclaim process from 'struct vmpressure' associated with each memcg. This should
> let user-space asses how successful proactive reclaim triggered from memcg
> 'memory.reclaim' was ?
> 
> With the patch following command flow is expected:
> 
>  # echo "1M" > memory.reclaim
> 
>  # cat memory.reclaim
>    scanned 76
>    reclaimed 32
> 

Yosry already mentioned the race issue with the implementation and I
would prefer we don't create any new dependency on vmpressure which I
think we should deprecate.

Anyways my question is how are you planning to use these metrics i.e.
scanned & reclaimed? I wonder if the data you are interested in can be
extracted without a stable interface. Have you tried BPF way to get
these metrics? We already have a tracepoint in vmscan tracing the
scanned and reclaimed.