Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:08:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:08:47 -0500 Received: from smtp.Lynuxworks.COM ([207.21.185.24]:1801 "EHLO smtp.lynuxworks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:08:36 -0500 Message-ID: <3C058A62.6010504@lnxw.com> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:07:46 -0800 From: Petko Manolov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011127 X-Accept-Language: en, bg MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Viro CC: Peter Waltenberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Coding style - a non-issue In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander Viro wrote: > >>Someone who cares, come up with an indentrc for the kernel code, and get it >>into Documentation/CodingStyle ... > indent does _not_ solve the problem of: ... I quite liked it, applies perfectly for some people i know... :-) Anyway, in Lindent you'll see "-psl" (--procname-start-lines) option which contradict with what is written in CodingStyle i.e: int my_proc(void) { ... } which I personally prefer. Petko - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/