Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <07c8cac0-ab85-19a7-de2c-14f6dc1c496a@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 19 May 2022 09:23:06 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.8.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] clk: qcom: alpha-pll: correct kerneldoc
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220501103520.111561-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <2f73874b-430a-48d2-4739-b06eebed1ea8@linaro.org>
 <20220519001438.E534DC385A9@smtp.kernel.org>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220519001438.E534DC385A9@smtp.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 19/05/2022 02:14, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2022-05-17 09:46:49)
>> On 01/05/2022 12:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Correct kerneldoc warning:
>>>
>>>   drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c:1450:
>>>     warning: expecting prototype for clk_lucid_pll_configure(). Prototype was for clk_trion_pll_configure() instead
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>
>> Any comments on entire set?
> 
> Please send a cover letter next time. Also they're simply "qcom" related
> but otherwise I'm not sure why they aren't sent to individual subsystem
> lists. They don't depend on each other to build, right?

Indeed, they can go via separate subsystems. I'll split the series in v2.

Best regards,
Krzysztof