Received: by 2002:a6b:500f:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e15csp2013854iob; Thu, 19 May 2022 22:52:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyAujIikUXMdq96aGhGhlsIK/krGEi8GkK7mZeuHzrM0PClLCwSsBet3aeTPtLi9Io2u97E X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2747:b0:42a:eb65:3725 with SMTP id z7-20020a056402274700b0042aeb653725mr9202691edd.338.1653025950779; Thu, 19 May 2022 22:52:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1653025950; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jPff6M/LL+ptJn0HZ6XcZSZwDmbgJ0O15eq5mKP3PEsQK+eXEq7SZJae7vsHoe4/4e zZyNcxalQq6Ln02gLsjFlnHfkgTibJOADI+64YD545ql0lGHHYuXqbtlWfzHi3MFvVKT 6nAAYCnSamoBEE/2DwLetI3RENqnG1o2z09+FvuVMqrIpy2v7Xlk3gJDe+T4FUnv/mln d2SKsoBhNI8H6P9tvSJsSW5GWdq1uCM/s2G0+gBEoePjs8OXtsIZ9XCCqxtUBf8ltPQO cVOkWycQwD7Aln2xRuAShCw/RtAVKDh1+eYjscLpa3VqjFijvHUdhfx2IoHinpRoymUD 3bnw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=EW4kz6CXBaV3ibI8sRiKBbNSrNIU2gGAvOl1c9GCA5A=; b=peBZyzJtj0YOyngG2807PZbJ+uguSRgdwdQ1X2VYtB2g1PBTMdV5T56MPsj3buXF4Y U5L8/KeLQ8c905S5aB2wv4Vh4d59PaNqHxTc2c8tPltPqKg9nar1BQV/XFLvggBR4xfw lyIyiv7OUy47C3MzijTDP5TXpU2YZu29wLf7ftdsOgcYCxq45DncXeo4qWra3gPC4dMI k9u11MvLObJiHZodbYsW4qphPaJIQ1gZznlstQ8LSMwHRbHDR9NycBjd8mCwDWkX8CJY 5Hf1b7bArMVa9Gz2itx3pBvtlS52byuqL4ubbGaYBoJ+f3fDbBiWgQ8Rzrcp/mPvxQLs OeoQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=NXOEMpN8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dp8-20020a170906c14800b006fea4101e47si1858799ejc.233.2022.05.19.22.52.02; Thu, 19 May 2022 22:52:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=NXOEMpN8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238193AbiESMvT (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 19 May 2022 08:51:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52890 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238253AbiESMu5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 May 2022 08:50:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x643.google.com (mail-pl1-x643.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::643]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8EC82EA1E; Thu, 19 May 2022 05:50:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x643.google.com with SMTP id s14so4695078plk.8; Thu, 19 May 2022 05:50:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=EW4kz6CXBaV3ibI8sRiKBbNSrNIU2gGAvOl1c9GCA5A=; b=NXOEMpN8VHSSxuzD8OhheRfA/nO6/F5NanEvkm6nGdpKu7KUTxlSa6+BaqHdgrXw/L CjOUvFf+WisM0vdaTsghojO4vHXYW+v2bzY4MJdce1Q6EKvllM46XOFk4P2tQuMrEWd0 irfumm565ohtetRB1oZ3tTXAWKLZudq5+yQnKiiibpfOTIXu8O1UnwHPIo2qgul3+Gy9 TvlTfXRu3J7Vr/srKqw4Jv/ieBHUn5puZOfw3pAriSAGnKjCRIOM38KpD7Ldp0blBtC+ bXK/Rhwcz7T0lgWuQ5GFMhU14b4cqEcU3My2oQn7E7sTGAXNMM88I2yM8IV/J7JdLrBK KAqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=EW4kz6CXBaV3ibI8sRiKBbNSrNIU2gGAvOl1c9GCA5A=; b=3l1OKJGuUObjXHC+kNxUXFmnmfw1TCUKbj4Q9nN57A/ugKm1bttcHk6ZzOpK5tF8Yb UF5Uab5s1mNEYnXkQXYQe9OD9uI3OnmWSlpRkaVd9N/hFCKE5p2GQL6wU5fuSbEJHAqW a1a8MPiVWZ+ykmlcsA8ZztjcoavYlSiZSShNGrLXeeADIKyYwGxs9g18sE17lFCNtu9s 92UIbPzwOMCU9JKL48Q9RyRTT126VS4KipUT7DtDgBV9EpjipzfhrDSssit+5TRe8GbO yHasKHbH9EgqM9timVk/iXkSK5fS6zybFVursQDQE6m16IPK6LOOJ3Ogc7gYARLxzs8A TZJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530CWQK2j/0gCCWyavqvFEMLfV1INeTGpt9bJTdNgWP0mTgi09Cr 2SgL0ItD3X/WhSbSgvOL5xw= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e388:b0:1df:ac20:df7d with SMTP id b8-20020a17090ae38800b001dfac20df7dmr5699859pjz.208.1652964643884; Thu, 19 May 2022 05:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([14.139.187.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c15-20020a63ea0f000000b003c14af50615sm3485750pgi.45.2022.05.19.05.50.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 19 May 2022 05:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 18:21:32 +0530 From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi To: Benjamin Tissoires Cc: Greg KH , Jiri Kosina , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Shuah Khan , Dave Marchevsky , Joe Stringer , Jonathan Corbet , Tero Kristo , lkml , "open list:HID CORE LAYER" , Networking , bpf , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Linux Doc Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/17] selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_hid_hw_request Message-ID: <20220519125132.lm4ztduemzyvystf@apollo.legion> References: <20220518205924.399291-1-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> <20220518205924.399291-13-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> <20220518222055.zh7hvexbqlctvotw@apollo.legion> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 05:42:40PM IST, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 12:20 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi > wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 02:29:19AM IST, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > > > Add tests for the newly implemented function. > > > We test here only the GET_REPORT part because the other calls are pure > > > HID protocol and won't infer the result of the test of the bpf hook. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires > > > > > > --- > > > > > > changes in v5: > > > - use the new hid_bpf_allocate_context() API > > > - remove the need for ctx_in for syscall TEST_RUN > > > > > > changes in v3: > > > - use the new hid_get_data API > > > - directly use HID_FEATURE_REPORT and HID_REQ_GET_REPORT from uapi > > > > > > changes in v2: > > > - split the series by bpf/libbpf/hid/selftests and samples > > > --- > > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++--- > > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c | 59 ++++++++++ > > > 2 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c > > > index 47bc0a30c275..54c0a0fcd54d 100644 > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c > > > @@ -77,12 +77,23 @@ static unsigned char rdesc[] = { > > > 0xc0, /* END_COLLECTION */ > > > }; > > > > > > +static u8 feature_data[] = { 1, 2 }; > > > + > > > struct attach_prog_args { > > > int prog_fd; > > > unsigned int hid; > > > int retval; > > > }; > > > > > > +struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args { > > > + __u8 data[10]; > > > + unsigned int hid; > > > + int retval; > > > + size_t size; > > > + enum hid_report_type type; > > > + __u8 request_type; > > > +}; > > > + > > > static pthread_mutex_t uhid_started_mtx = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; > > > static pthread_cond_t uhid_started = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER; > > > > > > @@ -142,7 +153,7 @@ static void destroy(int fd) > > > > > > static int uhid_event(int fd) > > > { > > > - struct uhid_event ev; > > > + struct uhid_event ev, answer; > > > ssize_t ret; > > > > > > memset(&ev, 0, sizeof(ev)); > > > @@ -183,6 +194,15 @@ static int uhid_event(int fd) > > > break; > > > case UHID_GET_REPORT: > > > fprintf(stderr, "UHID_GET_REPORT from uhid-dev\n"); > > > + > > > + answer.type = UHID_GET_REPORT_REPLY; > > > + answer.u.get_report_reply.id = ev.u.get_report.id; > > > + answer.u.get_report_reply.err = ev.u.get_report.rnum == 1 ? 0 : -EIO; > > > + answer.u.get_report_reply.size = sizeof(feature_data); > > > + memcpy(answer.u.get_report_reply.data, feature_data, sizeof(feature_data)); > > > + > > > + uhid_write(fd, &answer); > > > + > > > break; > > > case UHID_SET_REPORT: > > > fprintf(stderr, "UHID_SET_REPORT from uhid-dev\n"); > > > @@ -391,6 +411,7 @@ static int open_hidraw(int dev_id) > > > struct test_params { > > > struct hid *skel; > > > int hidraw_fd; > > > + int hid_id; > > > }; > > > > > > static int prep_test(int dev_id, const char *prog_name, struct test_params *test_data) > > > @@ -419,27 +440,33 @@ static int prep_test(int dev_id, const char *prog_name, struct test_params *test > > > if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(hid_skel, "hid_skel_open")) > > > goto cleanup; > > > > > > - prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(*hid_skel->skeleton->obj, prog_name); > > > - if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "find_prog_by_name")) > > > - goto cleanup; > > > + if (prog_name) { > > > + prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(*hid_skel->skeleton->obj, prog_name); > > > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "find_prog_by_name")) > > > + goto cleanup; > > > > > > - bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true); > > > + bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true); > > > > > > - err = hid__load(hid_skel); > > > - if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_skel_load")) > > > - goto cleanup; > > > + err = hid__load(hid_skel); > > > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_skel_load")) > > > + goto cleanup; > > > > > > - attach_fd = bpf_program__fd(hid_skel->progs.attach_prog); > > > - if (!ASSERT_GE(attach_fd, 0, "locate attach_prog")) { > > > - err = attach_fd; > > > - goto cleanup; > > > - } > > > + attach_fd = bpf_program__fd(hid_skel->progs.attach_prog); > > > + if (!ASSERT_GE(attach_fd, 0, "locate attach_prog")) { > > > + err = attach_fd; > > > + goto cleanup; > > > + } > > > > > > - args.prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog); > > > - err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(attach_fd, &tattr); > > > - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "attach_hid(%s)", prog_name); > > > - if (!ASSERT_EQ(args.retval, 0, buf)) > > > - goto cleanup; > > > + args.prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog); > > > + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(attach_fd, &tattr); > > > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "attach_hid(%s)", prog_name); > > > + if (!ASSERT_EQ(args.retval, 0, buf)) > > > + goto cleanup; > > > + } else { > > > + err = hid__load(hid_skel); > > > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_skel_load")) > > > + goto cleanup; > > > + } > > > > > > hidraw_fd = open_hidraw(dev_id); > > > if (!ASSERT_GE(hidraw_fd, 0, "open_hidraw")) > > > @@ -447,6 +474,7 @@ static int prep_test(int dev_id, const char *prog_name, struct test_params *test > > > > > > test_data->skel = hid_skel; > > > test_data->hidraw_fd = hidraw_fd; > > > + test_data->hid_id = hid_id; > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > @@ -693,6 +721,54 @@ static int test_hid_change_report(int uhid_fd, int dev_id) > > > return ret; > > > } > > > > > > +/* > > > + * Attach hid_user_raw_request to the given uhid device, > > > + * call the bpf program from userspace > > > + * check that the program is called and does the expected. > > > + */ > > > +static int test_hid_user_raw_request_call(int uhid_fd, int dev_id) > > > +{ > > > + struct test_params params; > > > + int err, prog_fd; > > > + int ret = -1; > > > + struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args args = { > > > + .retval = -1, > > > + .type = HID_FEATURE_REPORT, > > > + .request_type = HID_REQ_GET_REPORT, > > > + .size = 10, > > > + }; > > > + DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, tattrs, > > > + .ctx_in = &args, > > > + .ctx_size_in = sizeof(args), > > > + ); > > > + > > > + err = prep_test(dev_id, NULL, ¶ms); > > > + if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "prep_test()")) > > > + goto cleanup; > > > + > > > + args.hid = params.hid_id; > > > + args.data[0] = 1; /* report ID */ > > > + > > > + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(params.skel->progs.hid_user_raw_request); > > > + > > > + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &tattrs); > > > + if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts")) > > > + goto cleanup; > > > + > > > + if (!ASSERT_EQ(args.retval, 2, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts_retval")) > > > + goto cleanup; > > > + > > > + if (!ASSERT_EQ(args.data[1], 2, "hid_user_raw_request_check_in")) > > > + goto cleanup; > > > + > > > + ret = 0; > > > + > > > +cleanup: > > > + cleanup_test(¶ms); > > > + > > > + return ret; > > > +} > > > + > > > void serial_test_hid_bpf(void) > > > { > > > int err, uhid_fd; > > > @@ -720,6 +796,8 @@ void serial_test_hid_bpf(void) > > > ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_attach_detach"); > > > err = test_hid_change_report(uhid_fd, dev_id); > > > ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_change_report"); > > > + err = test_hid_user_raw_request_call(uhid_fd, dev_id); > > > + ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_change_report"); > > > > > > destroy(uhid_fd); > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c > > > index ee7529c47ad8..e3444d444303 100644 > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c > > > @@ -10,6 +10,13 @@ extern __u8 *hid_bpf_get_data(struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx, > > > unsigned int offset, > > > const size_t __sz) __ksym; > > > extern int hid_bpf_attach_prog(unsigned int hid_id, int prog_fd, u32 flags) __ksym; > > > +extern struct hid_bpf_ctx *hid_bpf_allocate_context(unsigned int hid_id) __ksym; > > > +extern void hid_bpf_release_context(struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx) __ksym; > > > +extern int hid_bpf_hw_request(struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx, > > > + __u8 *data, > > > + size_t len, > > > + enum hid_report_type type, > > > + int reqtype) __ksym; > > > > > > struct attach_prog_args { > > > int prog_fd; > > > @@ -56,3 +63,55 @@ int attach_prog(struct attach_prog_args *ctx) > > > 0); > > > return 0; > > > } > > > + > > > +struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args { > > > + /* data needs to come at offset 0 so we can do a memcpy into it */ > > > + __u8 data[10]; > > > + unsigned int hid; > > > + int retval; > > > + size_t size; > > > + enum hid_report_type type; > > > + __u8 request_type; > > > +}; > > > + > > > +SEC("syscall") > > > +int hid_user_raw_request(struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args *args) > > > +{ > > > + struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx; > > > + int i, ret = 0; > > > + __u8 *data; > > > + > > > + ctx = hid_bpf_allocate_context(args->hid); > > > + if (!ctx) > > > + return 0; /* EPERM check */ > > > + > > > + /* We can not use the context data memory directly in the hid_bpf call, > > > + * so we rely on the PTR_TO_MEM allocated in the hid_bpf_context > > > + */ > > > + data = hid_bpf_get_data(ctx, 0 /* offset */, 10 /* size */); > > > + if (!data) > > > + goto out; /* EPERM check */ > > > + > > > > If I'm reading this right, you need more than just returning PTR_TO_MEM. Since > > this points into allocated ctx, nothing prevents user from accessing data after > > we do hid_bpf_release_context. > > oops. I missed that point. > > TBH, ideally I wanted to directly pass args->data into > hid_bpf_hw_request(). But because args is seen as the context of the > program, I can not pass it to the kfunc arguments. > I would happily prevent getting a data pointer for a manually > allocated context if I could solve that issue. This would save me from > calling twice __builtin_memcpy. Oh, is that why you need to do this? So if you were able to pass args->data, you wouldn't need this hid_bpf_get_data? kfunc does support taking PTR_TO_CTX (i.e. args in your case), I am not sure why you're not passing it in directly then. Did you encounter any errors when trying to do so? The only requirement is that args offset must be 0 (i.e. passed as is without increment). > > That doesn't change the fact that you are correct and the PTR_TO_MEM > in kfunc code should be fixed. > But right now, I am not sure what you mean below and I'll need a > little bit more time to process it. > > Cheers, > Benjamin > > > > > The ref_obj_id of ctx needs to be transferred to R0.ref_obj_id, and R0.id needs > > to be assigned another id distinct from the ref_obj_id. > > > > My idea would be to give this type of function a new set, and handle this case > > of transferring ref_obj_id into R0. See is_ptr_cast_function in verifier.c. > > Shouldn't be too much code. You could even use the bpf_kfunc_arg_meta to store > > the ref_obj_id (and ensure only one referenced register exists among the 5 > > arguments). > > > > > + __builtin_memcpy(data, args->data, sizeof(args->data)); > > > + > > > + if (args->size <= sizeof(args->data)) { > > > + ret = hid_bpf_hw_request(ctx, > > > + data, > > > + args->size, > > > + args->type, > > > + args->request_type); > > > + args->retval = ret; > > > + if (ret < 0) > > > + goto out; > > > + } else { > > > + ret = -7; /* -E2BIG */ > > > + goto out; > > > + } > > > + > > > + __builtin_memcpy(args->data, data, sizeof(args->data)); > > > + > > > + out: > > > + hid_bpf_release_context(ctx); > > > + > > > + return ret; > > > +} > > > -- > > > 2.36.1 > > > > > > > -- > > Kartikeya > > > -- Kartikeya