Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933223AbXEOJNo (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2007 05:13:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758084AbXEOJNh (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2007 05:13:37 -0400 Received: from zakalwe.fi ([80.83.5.154]:39804 "EHLO zakalwe.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757412AbXEOJNh (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2007 05:13:37 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:12:46 +0300 From: Heikki Orsila To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: On __pure and __attribute_pure__ Message-ID: <20070515091246.GE10873@zakalwe.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 697 Lines: 16 Both __pure and __attribute_pure__ are the same, and I found out that there is only a handful of users for these. __attribute_pure__ is used in approximately 15 places, and __pure is not used anywhere. Is either __pure or __attribute_pure__ preferred? Imo, __pure looks much nicer than __attribute_pure__ so we could do a replacement. -- Heikki Orsila Barbie's law: heikki.orsila@iki.fi "Math is hard, let's go shopping!" http://www.iki.fi/shd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/