Received: by 2002:a05:6602:18e:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m14csp1650572ioo; Sun, 22 May 2022 23:02:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzzDVpP2tn364eKTL85XWwAlnjLGIAohBZmWBb0QED/vFTmcwgFQGg+gvzYj5Z9cZgnb5j+ X-Received: by 2002:a63:9dc7:0:b0:3f6:17f0:f310 with SMTP id i190-20020a639dc7000000b003f617f0f310mr18587169pgd.285.1653285741264; Sun, 22 May 2022 23:02:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1653285741; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RH3PAaG05Y3hAjI1I7F3dIxDTrBkeY4wCDXF9nIRAadfuLo6W/LtjUKhp8UFqoCDkW Fy0Up0Urvv6ysa2pgvuH2rvwBPcoKojQkhG/3dU5e/q34bUy4KKnlhTSJxWs2Djy8Pn5 /g19qWqTRZAmX2huovGrL2UdQyT3+eky9kSP9U4Yq2vNhiy8wK/2s9CWwWesH/UP8R8w 1wzzd67cw0fqr2vbonRHQyjJ6zoO7zrkdGewlKnlUldrWRJx2jZAeIMqaC6xJQDOpOhu b5s+9JQmJ2BWYPjwPMrSukjlnKK7Z/KSjOMl2+Aw4elyO0QJpw8xuL7qOVwfygJGoLne AgUA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=xxyhl8hHZLFvYuKrBOeUuiz5/xSOjIEJVZn/so9e9Jo=; b=KSbccvL1rqZa6JQiduehZZH0Hb+5vnSpZDI+TbCV4R/gCZ/sALgHED2LRbIutEKu4k 8hDwGPnd1297BR5gojKDTnueYgrKblvIPhMTZhBKNyAlsOv9Wd4Q1schfuv+/JAnRkvu ENU9eSjYJWK1STg+XW8lZObdjnLZKkYgPMutv7cUk1sjctjQLDgfE6GDqRgaX9CHERtg zlCUJ0JjiONNMnuUZ1tkO4XOalUY6VSWU/s0DUJ4iiFq5CL143+YJTi1Qwmst9yhSMMb No2L/wQI91mGQXPT//YjWAD7ITANvWeOkrOwz+tVG3Pa+hGRBU8yjVAZSlslp5pS+m9k F9ZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=SBFQLCVg; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=i9BFUa2q; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [23.128.96.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j23-20020a63fc17000000b003c6d5d28d7esi8668718pgi.176.2022.05.22.23.02.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 22 May 2022 23:02:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=SBFQLCVg; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=i9BFUa2q; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A48F14D20; Sun, 22 May 2022 22:55:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1352870AbiEWCaQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 22 May 2022 22:30:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53646 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1352878AbiEWCaO (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2022 22:30:14 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E62D3702D; Sun, 22 May 2022 19:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E0721A3E; Mon, 23 May 2022 02:30:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1653273011; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xxyhl8hHZLFvYuKrBOeUuiz5/xSOjIEJVZn/so9e9Jo=; b=SBFQLCVgJujUr9a6oFzRsek2OC2o3hImU+UFVELtFaL0DldRFv8ekz9rMk3fZzQCEHEVqo MJNnw6aa00yO2zkyR+5x5UQGkpThknlg1rkCYWv6RoSpUcZliytUIUnEoR5XiTTDiFNZDC QzPDyj2EO+j44+gehs4XxgVW2q8cTUY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1653273011; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xxyhl8hHZLFvYuKrBOeUuiz5/xSOjIEJVZn/so9e9Jo=; b=i9BFUa2qS9RUGtWl+OV0xYhy6rFdeRs7uIx4L08pvw6fuIj5rSWhoh38LfuiA/qjdoAspB xT1N9E5ocRBgcYBQ== Received: from lion.mk-sys.cz (unknown [10.100.200.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB31A2C141; Mon, 23 May 2022 02:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lion.mk-sys.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EBDE460294; Mon, 23 May 2022 04:24:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 04:24:38 +0200 From: Michal Kubecek To: Jiasheng Jiang Cc: steffen.klassert@secunet.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: REGRESSION (?) (Re: [PATCH] net: af_key: add check for pfkey_broadcast in function pfkey_process) Message-ID: <20220523022438.ofhehjievu2alj3h@lion.mk-sys.cz> References: <20220517094231.414168-1-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="g42tgft3y3hx52j4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220517094231.414168-1-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --g42tgft3y3hx52j4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 05:42:31PM +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote: > If skb_clone() returns null pointer, pfkey_broadcast() will > return error. > Therefore, it should be better to check the return value of > pfkey_broadcast() and return error if fails. >=20 > Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") > Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang > --- > net/key/af_key.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >=20 > diff --git a/net/key/af_key.c b/net/key/af_key.c > index fd51db3be91c..92e9d75dba2f 100644 > --- a/net/key/af_key.c > +++ b/net/key/af_key.c > @@ -2826,8 +2826,10 @@ static int pfkey_process(struct sock *sk, struct s= k_buff *skb, const struct sadb > void *ext_hdrs[SADB_EXT_MAX]; > int err; > =20 > - pfkey_broadcast(skb_clone(skb, GFP_KERNEL), GFP_KERNEL, > - BROADCAST_PROMISC_ONLY, NULL, sock_net(sk)); > + err =3D pfkey_broadcast(skb_clone(skb, GFP_KERNEL), GFP_KERNEL, > + BROADCAST_PROMISC_ONLY, NULL, sock_net(sk)); > + if (err) > + return err; > =20 > memset(ext_hdrs, 0, sizeof(ext_hdrs)); > err =3D parse_exthdrs(skb, hdr, ext_hdrs); After upgrading from 5.18-rc7 to 5.18 final, my racoon daemon refuses to start because it cannot find some algorithms (it says "aes"). I have not finished the debugging completely but this patch, mainline commit 4dc2a5a8f675 ("net: af_key: add check for pfkey_broadcast in function pfkey_process"), seems to be the most promising candidate. As far as I can see, pfkey_broadcast() returns -ESRCH whenever it does not send the message to at least one registered listener. But this cannot happen here even if there were one as BROADCAST_PROMISC_ONLY flag makes pfkey_broadcast() skip the rest of the loop before err could be set: sk_for_each_rcu(sk, &net_pfkey->table) { =2E.. if (broadcast_flags !=3D BROADCAST_ALL) { if (broadcast_flags & BROADCAST_PROMISC_ONLY) continue; if ((broadcast_flags & BROADCAST_REGISTERED) && !pfk->registered) continue; if (broadcast_flags & BROADCAST_ONE) continue; } err2 =3D pfkey_broadcast_one(skb, GFP_ATOMIC, sk); /* Error is cleared after successful sending to at least one * registered KM */ if ((broadcast_flags & BROADCAST_REGISTERED) && err) err =3D err2; } and the only other option to change err from -ESRCH is if (one_sk !=3D NULL) err =3D pfkey_broadcast_one(skb, allocation, one_sk); which cannot happen either as one_sk is null when called from pfkey_process(). So unless I missed something, bailing out on any non-zero return value in pfkey_process() is wrong without reworking the logic of pfkey_broadcast() return value first.=20 Michal --g42tgft3y3hx52j4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEWN3j3bieVmp26mKO538sG/LRdpUFAmKK8GAACgkQ538sG/LR dpUHTAf9ERCtb+WT/nqUex+gV8YmPze/VHGfpivZX06w3CEDBI0VUtt7rGJDDGGu 3Ca4WGfZRlLQk5da3ysbgZA7iTBTIsbYrnxHzNXjiBA4/w8Nuf1Rn/2cpk4Kyafb FvqLfFCxeF6HXH+rtsFIe7nQOWewY5shqOOOhRWeq8z8kQou9RWoM/Pg/IVmhuyz j4hnuDsar1Dot9d1Fxxq5tP8xzUqCm6t5Qya+3ZE9nhL1ACaxTrsg+pOZmb5tBg8 ymtQra26k/hfii9vX8cBxb85p8kigpsbPtDPl3WEXiwgO+utdu+gQ7L7WQ9e4DGH Vsrg7eEKdMZby1lkM16WEFIduzJmrw== =Eg5V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --g42tgft3y3hx52j4--