Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Fri, 20 May 2022 22:31:02 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        mcgrof@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: RFC: Ioctl v2
Message-ID: <Yof6hsC1hLiYITdh@lunn.ch>
References: <20220520161652.rmhqlvwvfrvskg4w@moria.home.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220520161652.rmhqlvwvfrvskg4w@moria.home.lan>
Precedence: bulk

> I want to circulate this and get some comments and feedback, and if
> no one raises any serious objections - I'd love to get collaborators
> to work on this with me. Flame away!

Hi Kent

I doubt you will get much interest from netdev. netdev already
considers ioctl as legacy, and mostly uses netlink and a message
passing structure, which is easy to extend in a backwards compatible
manor.

https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/netlink.7.html

	Andrew