Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 01:50:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 01:50:22 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([204.152.189.113]:2178 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 01:50:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:18:59 -0500 To: Alexander Viro Cc: rwhron@earthlink.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: fsync02 test hangs 2.5.1-pre3 + patch Message-ID: <20011129001859.B17852@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <20011128220329.A2718@earthlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from viro@math.psu.edu on Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:12:22PM -0500 From: rwhron@earthlink.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:12:22PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: > > This was on a reiserfs system, btw. > > Obvious tests: > a) 2.5.1-pre2 2.5.1-pre2 was fine. > b) 2.5.1-pre2 + fs/super.c from 2.5.1-pre3 > c) 2.5.1-pre3 + fs/super.c from 2.5.1-pre2 > (fs/super.c changes are independent from everything else). I'll try option c and let you know what happens. > Another possibility is silent fs corruption from 2.5.0/2.4.15 - if you > ran these kernels you really ought to do fsck -f (or whatever is used > to force recovery of reiserfs). I did have some nasty errors while running dbench around those kernel versions. To be safe, I did a cpio backup and re-mkreiserfs'd three filesystems with 2.4.16. The filesystem that fsync02 hung on was one of the recently rebuilt filesystems. -- Randy Hron - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/