Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220519193133.194138-1-axboe@kernel.dk> <YoajCafKmgUbbaY0@zx2c4.com>
 <a6c843ff-a3d7-ce6a-4e99-70968834a02a@kernel.dk> <YobPB27Ozl7uqUEu@zx2c4.com> <3553b935-0aca-3d3e-2495-12288f601b53@kernel.dk>
In-Reply-To: <3553b935-0aca-3d3e-2495-12288f601b53@kernel.dk>
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 May 2022 01:23:48 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHmME9riX+YuqSVp64bhy=nX08_7d-m8es82BHy2qh-oWkqa8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/2] Fix splice from random/urandom
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jens,

On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 1:19 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> The source and destination for the copies are exactly the same with the
> change as before, so no changes there. The non-user copy is a different
> helper.

Oh, okay. Maybe a silly question but: should we wire up that helper
too? (If I'm understanding your meaning right.) Seems like it'd be a
good idea to just wire up all the things while we're at it.

Jason