Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 11:39:40 +0200
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
To:     =?utf-8?B?6ZmI5a2m5YW1?= <chenxuebing@jari.cn>
Cc:     catalin.marinas@arm.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, rppt@kernel.org,
        rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: setup: use strscpy to replace strlcpy
Message-ID: <20220523093940.GA6296@alpha.franken.de>
References: <533ed227.9dd.180eabb3189.Coremail.chenxuebing@jari.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <533ed227.9dd.180eabb3189.Coremail.chenxuebing@jari.cn>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 03:46:18PM +0800, 陈学兵 wrote:
> 
> The strlcpy should not be used because it doesn't limit the source
> length. Preferred is strscpy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: XueBing Chen <chenxuebing@jari.cn>
> ---
>  arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]