Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 15:29:17 +0200
From:   Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= <mkoutny@suse.com>
To:     Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Cc:     cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] selftests: memcg: Fix compilation
Message-ID: <20220523132917.GA4988@blackbody.suse.cz>
References: <20220518161859.21565-1-mkoutny@suse.com>
 <20220518161859.21565-2-mkoutny@suse.com>
 <5242b7ab-d6b6-55d4-c211-ec27293be795@collabora.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <5242b7ab-d6b6-55d4-c211-ec27293be795@collabora.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 07:11:01PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> wrote:
> On 5/18/22 9:18 PM, Michal Koutn? wrote:
> > This fixes mis-applied changes from commit 72b1e03aa725 ("cgroup:
> > account for memory_localevents in test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events()").
> Shouldn't the Fixes tag be added here and in 2/5 patch?

Ad the patch 1/5 -- yes, sounds appropriate.

Ad the patch 2/5 -- that's an effective revert, I don't see reverts
being marked with Fixes.

I see the patch 5/5 didn't make it to MLs (their public archives, except
for LKML). So I'll resend the series with the modified commit message
(if nothing else pops up).

Michal