Received: by 2002:a05:6602:18e:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m14csp2101603ioo; Mon, 23 May 2022 10:05:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6xkx+oTEJzJF1IHGqmtrJzf32ZnVhxruVnnkkFsfjCexB8tt5DbKXhQc18BDvSr+Vf8ke X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:179e:b0:518:9e1d:1cbd with SMTP id s30-20020a056a00179e00b005189e1d1cbdmr6286423pfg.12.1653325557324; Mon, 23 May 2022 10:05:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1653325557; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eJKBoClJ220AzzycqgH0nP5jtX8nSFIBhJwOstRurvJBN1fWZUf4IZP01pTTFZj8sC xYaCSO9G2s3gN0SCHD/MCrLcooEDsmKFcVf3DEESRldRhwGqhVopzcDrUAnwR3Xz9zbN AhpfbjEkjp4knr5IhVHHxtP0oHTo+vhXRI4/v18Ge5/m3qU+DESkYmR1O/3yslNPPOc2 Va1VdwvrljiMwgzh5sOBCjYZJ0AffqaU7llXk2XvgnM7NX6hFYLVCU08xO058neMdbFJ qSajSnp34o5G/mybx2aIYy8KcUVRR2f/XeAOL1MfS2nZZRgP+g3QdfcL/j8Tz5oi+L4f v3Zw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=PxZJNdlfV4iuueGCjNKAU5gN5kv7ZciqmdPuuHkpfBc=; b=UiCgvDiOhzkyPZC2bcqj4QSEnWe7xYPhCS++XKvdyeelkjdE8AyaiGagzjtOX/B54/ Ya37MpegC5mp2QO0XnCdPhySbisUOSgD172GdkweKWzCr3jJOErsNi7FVuYYn2NraSKZ ou/6qh1Cjp8vmNNNsL/XCJ5Gtg6qMdbmf58hyzglbZ655RT9a79xEkiH+wfKcN+2X5P0 uQYOfmk7GjuI5WzOZjPopJy7JQ/PLHpDZBS6IFNUJqKVkWgAbZ/3HlYUlpguEtSbaSXz qC0trwUzcVl8Z/LiFFM55xPJiMqo4UBSuWOOn6mfEpjSoph/zG5MmnFL/wAjFUrG77Ow Twhg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b="HjBAnk/Y"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [2620:137:e000::1:18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q21-20020a170902c75500b00158205c7f9bsi9842190plq.46.2022.05.23.10.05.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 23 May 2022 10:05:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b="HjBAnk/Y"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4372E6A02F; Mon, 23 May 2022 10:05:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239372AbiEWRFm (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 23 May 2022 13:05:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48056 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239316AbiEWRE7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2022 13:04:59 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 146006830B; Mon, 23 May 2022 10:04:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AA04614BF; Mon, 23 May 2022 17:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80B70C385A9; Mon, 23 May 2022 17:04:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1653325497; bh=rhNiHcKcwt4+PZWMHm/DhDagUxcc1+Te8lDussxpnkQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HjBAnk/YkyV5GoRwOchu7US4yLdMF0YmsOzSvNyp6XFHM0heqSMEr20HbEZEQtz2j JKIBKnilcv6jYbduaeTi+WL+sJLltkGppyhwKfhgGKT23P/s+fidSuB4Zl8RyvKA9T dtWJ+Pwk22lxLLeIYQkNqJrM3GOqLxq3OAD7O/Ms= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Norbert Slusarek , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Linus Torvalds Subject: [PATCH 4.9 11/25] perf: Fix sys_perf_event_open() race against self Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 19:03:29 +0200 Message-Id: <20220523165746.647111301@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 In-Reply-To: <20220523165743.398280407@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20220523165743.398280407@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Peter Zijlstra commit 3ac6487e584a1eb54071dbe1212e05b884136704 upstream. Norbert reported that it's possible to race sys_perf_event_open() such that the looser ends up in another context from the group leader, triggering many WARNs. The move_group case checks for races against itself, but the !move_group case doesn't, seemingly relying on the previous group_leader->ctx == ctx check. However, that check is racy due to not holding any locks at that time. Therefore, re-check the result after acquiring locks and bailing if they no longer match. Additionally, clarify the not_move_group case from the move_group-vs-move_group race. Fixes: f63a8daa5812 ("perf: Fix event->ctx locking") Reported-by: Norbert Slusarek Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/events/core.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -9903,6 +9903,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, * Do not allow to attach to a group in a different task * or CPU context. If we're moving SW events, we'll fix * this up later, so allow that. + * + * Racy, not holding group_leader->ctx->mutex, see comment with + * perf_event_ctx_lock(). */ if (!move_group && group_leader->ctx != ctx) goto err_context; @@ -9952,11 +9955,22 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, } else { perf_event_ctx_unlock(group_leader, gctx); move_group = 0; + goto not_move_group; } } } else { mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex); + + /* + * Now that we hold ctx->lock, (re)validate group_leader->ctx == ctx, + * see the group_leader && !move_group test earlier. + */ + if (group_leader && group_leader->ctx != ctx) { + err = -EINVAL; + goto err_locked; + } } +not_move_group: if (ctx->task == TASK_TOMBSTONE) { err = -ESRCH;