Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 12:37:01 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, tj@kernel.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, jeyu@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
        bvanassche@acm.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, joe@perches.com,
        keescook@chromium.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, minchan@kernel.org,
        linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] selftests: add tests_sysfs module
Message-ID: <YoviXT37FAUqpQEu@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <20211029184500.2821444-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>
 <20211029184500.2821444-4-mcgrof@kernel.org>
 <Yao3vtSKBKLyQY1E@kroah.com>
 <87fsl1iqg0.ffs@tglx>
 <YopM5XGMdqVCU+bL@kroah.com>
 <87czg5ip2z.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87czg5ip2z.ffs@tglx>
Sender: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 05:06:44PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, May 22 2022 at 16:47, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 04:37:19PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 03 2021 at 16:29, Greg KH wrote:
> >> 
> >> While I agree that we want to keep the number of licenses as small as
> >> possible, we cannot really dictate which dual licensing options a
> >> submitter selects unless the license is GPL-2.0-only incompatible, which
> >> copyleft-next is not.
> >> 
> >> Can we just get over this, add the license with the SPDX identifier and
> >> move on?
> >
> > From what I recall, I had technical reasons I didn't take this series,
> > but that was a long time ago and I would be glad to review it again if
> > it were rebased and resubmitted after the next merge window is closed.
> 
> The license addition and the SPDX identifier cleanup should be seperated
> from the new test code which was part of the series.

I'll send a re-spin after the merge window and split this up.

And FWIW, AFAICT I addressed all the comments, so I can resend after
the spdx stuff gets merged so to make the series easier to read /
review.

  Luis