Received: by 2002:a05:6602:18e:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m14csp2477319ioo; Mon, 23 May 2022 21:07:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRjI4RM5ucr/JDwe+7K34P4+gHSRiqbQKT/usgUNpgBdLM5X6tXLyfk+8fh93bi77gqgYV X-Received: by 2002:a63:ee06:0:b0:3c1:bf06:59a3 with SMTP id e6-20020a63ee06000000b003c1bf0659a3mr23332601pgi.237.1653365279498; Mon, 23 May 2022 21:07:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1653365279; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kyMWiN0pURBzDT7tpAqB7SulGXoe46Oylh+Dqtl2BMIQP2ugYvi1wQ2qMCvyMu2FBo 7Xvn7pQPYXFYhOgP2+kObutpuzGg/75ouVIyZpXT+VDvGdsxX50L2YJl2g8rmXM34a1S E9SuaqhVtDvkgLxVskCSwFdwUYl9PP9Hozd5hbJL37BjTPXPslb5KTEH5cU8Hcu0aJf0 yBJAmYn1hD1P1a0aCpt/w4TOSrUBPTCcZz5d7Ub3+miJi9qFsYWGhzxVYA7anc5Z3hgg 8opRljyXl5CToOu9AKGiBCq5HMj5aVpZ/KdWwT09yCSmEejvJipOCkkb8z3xq1Lr5pBc 0GuA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=xulk3xFRcChsgqrCg3hLBIq6nicFSY5Xu30wymIBIsU=; b=BVQr19JJIHUpdcxxLWDZcx623qYJz75DGIzJdJUtK7AuVI5Rwu+y4btETHw+hDvwFN sToNPbj347jg8E67Ew/zqBCrGtQY7DCUD34CrRstjt1BCEvfrIN5TjT6le5ZKJiw+ZCj dUc0t09p8NZtf5O8J5UUNtRx54pNYmXOcD5xGOcLv3DSH4+g44DB09Z8z6E2i9mRfFbR q7ndyg2K3MrrO6mBrPYEHRcRktcSlVzAr4iKnbaOh+UISaFjZlxDtDFnh12lA2u5A2/g zYRQsTJTUZz4bsblGYeAzxcC/gQqQ+I1a4XovuZibhULCLHbm27HM+y2zDPPMkM+av+x 1N2g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d19-20020a170903209300b00153b2d1646asi10868210plc.114.2022.05.23.21.07.46; Mon, 23 May 2022 21:07:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232523AbiEXBNq (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 23 May 2022 21:13:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44394 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229470AbiEXBNq (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2022 21:13:46 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52118939C7; Mon, 23 May 2022 18:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi100019.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4L6bmz63z7zDqMC; Tue, 24 May 2022 09:13:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) by kwepemi100019.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.189) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 24 May 2022 09:13:42 +0800 Received: from [10.174.176.73] (10.174.176.73) by kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 24 May 2022 09:13:41 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v5 0/3] support concurrent sync io for bfq on a specail occasion To: Jan Kara CC: , , , , , , Jens Axboe References: <20220428120837.3737765-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> <61b67d5e-829c-8130-7bda-81615d654829@huawei.com> <81411289-e13c-20f5-df63-c059babca57a@huawei.com> <55919e29-1f22-e8aa-f3d2-08c57d9e1c22@huawei.com> <20220523085902.wmxoebyq3crerecr@quack3.lan> <25f6703e-9e10-75d9-a893-6df1e6b75254@kernel.dk> <20220523152516.7sr247i3bzwhr44w@quack3.lan> From: Yu Kuai Message-ID: <13ad158e-7859-ca61-209e-7d1fe99d0bdb@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 09:13:40 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20220523152516.7sr247i3bzwhr44w@quack3.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.176.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ?? 2022/05/23 23:25, Jan Kara ะด??: > On Mon 23-05-22 06:36:58, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 5/23/22 2:59 AM, Jan Kara wrote: >>> On Mon 23-05-22 09:10:38, yukuai (C) wrote: >>>> ? 2022/05/21 20:21, Jens Axboe ??: >>>>> On 5/21/22 1:22 AM, yukuai (C) wrote: >>>>>> ? 2022/05/14 17:29, yukuai (C) ??: >>>>>>> ? 2022/05/05 9:00, yukuai (C) ??: >>>>>>>> Hi, Paolo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you take a look at this patchset? It has been quite a long time >>>>>>>> since we spotted this problem... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> friendly ping ... >>>>>> friendly ping ... >>>>> >>>>> I can't speak for Paolo, but I've mentioned before that the majority >>>>> of your messages end up in my spam. That's still the case, in fact >>>>> I just marked maybe 10 of them as not spam. >>>>> >>>>> You really need to get this issued sorted out, or you will continue >>>>> to have patches ignore because folks may simply not see them. >>>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Thanks for your notice. >>>> >>>> Is it just me or do you see someone else's messages from *huawei.com >>>> end up in spam? I tried to seek help from our IT support, however, they >>>> didn't find anything unusual... >>> >>> So actually I have noticed that a lot of (valid) email from huawei.com (not >>> just you) ends up in the spam mailbox. For me direct messages usually pass >>> (likely matching SPF records for originating mail server save the email >>> from going to spam) but messages going through mailing lists are flagged as >>> spam because the emails are missing valid DKIM signature but huawei.com >>> DMARC config says there should be DKIM signature (even direct messages are >>> missing DKIM so this does not seem as a mailing list configuration issue). >>> So this seems as some misconfiguration of the mails on huawei.com side >>> (likely missing DKIM signing of outgoing email). >> >> SPF/DKIM was indeed a problem earlier for yukaui patches, but I don't >> see that anymore. Maybe it's still an issue for some emails, from them >> or Huawei in general? > > Hum, for me all emails from Huawei I've received even today fail the DKIM > check. After some more digging there is interesting inconsistency in DMARC > configuration for huawei.com domain. There is DMARC record for huawei.com > like: > > huawei.com. 600 IN TXT "v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc@edm.huawei.com" > > which means no DKIM is required but _dmarc.huawei.com has: > > _dmarc.huawei.com. 600 IN TXT "v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;ruf=mailto:dmarc@huawei.com;rua=mailto:dmarc@huawei.com" > > which says that DKIM is required. I guess this inconsistency may be the > reason why there are problems with DKIM validation for senders from > huawei.com. Yu Kuai, can you perhaps take this to your IT support to fix > this? Either make sure huawei.com emails get properly signed with DKIM or > remove the 'quarantine' record from _dmarc.huawei.com. Thanks! Of course, I'll try to contact our IT support. Thanks, Kuai > > Honza >