Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762037AbXEPLkq (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 07:40:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758236AbXEPLkg (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 07:40:36 -0400 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.171]:64569 "EHLO mgw-ext12.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758212AbXEPLkf convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 07:40:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org To: Jamie Lokier Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel , akpm@osdl.org, Evgeniy Polyakov , Albert Cahalan , Greg KH , John Stoffel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Oeser , Pekka Enberg , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Jan Engelhardt , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20070516113434.GC20482@mail.shareable.org> References: <20070515151919.GA32510@lazybastard.org> <17994.1241.436841.681216@stoffel.org> <20070515191926.GB1220@lazybastard.org> <1179291255.2859.195.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070516110933.GA5472@lazybastard.org> <20070516113434.GC20482@mail.shareable.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:38:18 +0300 Message-Id: <1179315498.3642.19.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-2.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2007 11:38:18.0784 (UTC) FILETIME=[B3135200:01C797AE] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1075 Lines: 28 On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 12:34 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Jörn Engel wrote: > > On Wed, 16 May 2007 12:54:14 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > Personally I'd just go for 'JFFS3'. After all, it has a better claim to > > > the name than either of its predecessors :) > > > > Did you ever see akpm's facial expression when he tried to pronounce > > "JFFS2"? ;) > > JFFS3 is a good, meaningful name to anyone familiar with JFFS2. > > But if akpm can't pronounce it, how about FFFS for faster flash > filesystem.... ;-) The problem is that JFFS2 will always be faster in terms of I/O speed anyway, just because it does not have to maintain on-flash indexing data structures. But yes, it is slow in mount and in building big inodes, so the "faster" is confusing. -- Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/