Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <c89a11b3-99e6-edbe-ae23-36038b7e3a07@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 May 2022 10:03:09 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ARM: mm: kill unused runtime hook arch_iounmap()
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
CC:     <will@kernel.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        <hch@infradead.org>, <arnd@arndb.de>, <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
References: <20220519082552.117736-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
 <20220519082552.117736-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
 <Yoezpw2AE5GT6CyP@arm.com>
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <Yoezpw2AE5GT6CyP@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 2022/5/20 23:28, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 04:25:47PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> Since the following commits,
>>
>> v5.4
>>    commit 59d3ae9a5bf6 ("ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support")
>> v5.11
>>    commit 3e3f354bc383 ("ARM: remove ebsa110 platform")
>>
>> The runtime hook arch_iounmap() on ARM is useless, kill arch_iounmap()
>> and __iounmap(), and the naming of arch_iounmap will be used in
>> GENERIC_IOREMAP with the later patch.
>>
>> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> Probably too late for this merging window but are you ok for this patch
> to go in via the arm64 tree (together with the rest of the series)?
>
> Alternatively it could go into your patch system and hopefully land in
> 5.19 so that we can take the rest for 5.20.
Russell, should I send it to patch system or let Catalin take it?
>
> Thanks.
>