Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <9badcfce-1db2-5381-bab8-8e52b875cebd@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 24 May 2022 19:33:41 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Convert SC7180 MSS
 bindings to YAML
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        ohad@wizery.com, agross@kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        swboyd@chromium.org, mka@chromium.org
References: <1652978825-5304-1-git-send-email-quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
 <1652978825-5304-4-git-send-email-quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
 <20220520224011.GA374485-robh@kernel.org>
 <371ce290-1deb-bff2-112b-71be8c005b37@linaro.org>
 <a5ad7884-d2c5-aeb0-405e-0121bb51f0a1@quicinc.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <a5ad7884-d2c5-aeb0-405e-0121bb51f0a1@quicinc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 24/05/2022 04:00, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Hey Rob/Krzysztof,
> 
> On 5/21/22 8:04 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/05/2022 00:40, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 10:17:05PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>>>> Convert SC7180 MSS PIL loading bindings to YAML.
>>>
>>> I suppose there is a reason the sc7180 is being split out and the only
>>> one converted, but this doesn't tell me.
>>
>> I am also confused, especially that last time I pointed out that there
>> is work already:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220511161602.117772-7-sireeshkodali1@gmail.com/
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/e3543961-1645-b02a-c869-f8fa1ad2d41c@quicinc.com/#t
> 
> The reason for the split was discussed on the list ^^, thought it
> wouldn't make much sense adding any of it to the commit message.
> Also since Krzysztof said he wanted a alignment between Sireesh/me
> we did exchange mails saying I'll take care of SC7180/SC7280 (since
> they had pas compatible which is overridden by mss compatible) and
> he could continue with the rest.


Sounds good to me, but Rob's got a point - this background should be
better explained.


Best regards,
Krzysztof