Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761443AbXEPPeb (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 11:34:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756591AbXEPPeZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 11:34:25 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:57134 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754723AbXEPPeY (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 11:34:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:29:35 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Tejun Heo Cc: Clemens Schwaighofer , linux-kernel , Maneesh Soni , Dipankar Sarma , Greg KH Subject: Re: Oops and Panics in 2.6.21.1, 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.19.2 Message-Id: <20070516082935.fe112ab5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <464AE56F.3040101@gmail.com> References: <464A4F56.6080108@tequila.co.jp> <20070515185350.2e77bf21.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <464AE56F.3040101@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1924 Lines: 52 On Wed, 16 May 2007 13:05:19 +0200 Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 16 May 2007 09:24:54 +0900 Clemens Schwaighofer wrote: > > > >> I have re-occurring oopses and panics in those above kernels. The error > >> is always the same. I have the last Kernel Panic as a picture here: > >> > >> http://dev.tequila.jp/clemens/R0010172.JPG > >> > >> The oops have the same error style like this Panic. I tried to capture > >> one, but right after copying it into vim, I got a Panic. So next time I > >> try to. > >> > >> I think it started with 2.6.19.2, I cannot remember I had any of those > >> problems before. The box can work fine for about a week or more, or it > >> looks up several times a day. I run a memtest for 10 h, but I had no errors. > > > > shrink_dcache_memory->...sysfs_d_iput->BUG > > > > BUG_ON(sd->s_dentry != dentry); > > > > a number of people have hit that, on and off. > > Yeah, I've been seeing that one. It should have been fixed with the big > fat patchset. Great - fingers crossed. > > We were close to having a fix, I think, but then we decided that great > > chunks of sysfs needed rewriting and I believe that we believe that this > > great rewrite will fix this bug. > > How were we gonna fix it? If it isn't too complex, I can cook up a > patch for -stable series. Do we actually understand the causes? > The safest approach I can think of is making > dentries for attributes unreclaimable but those are made reclaimable for > good reasons. :-( Yeah, that was the google workaround. It's OK unless you happen to have thousands of disks on an ia32 box. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/