Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:47:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:47:38 -0500 Received: from neon-gw.transmeta.com ([209.10.217.66]:1033 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:47:30 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 08:17:14 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Russell King cc: Alan Cox , Jeff Garzik , David Woodhouse , David Hinds , tytso@valinux.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) In-Reply-To: <200011170051.eAH0pvr18387@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Russell King wrote: > Alan Cox writes: > > >From a practical point of view that currently means 'delete Linus tree pcmcia > > regardless of what you are doing' since the modules from David Hinds and Linus > > pcmcia are not 100% binary compatible for all cases. > > However, deleting that code would render a significant number of ARM platforms > without PCMCIA support, which would be real bad. Right now, I suspect that the in-kernel pcmcia code is actually at the point where it _is_ possible to use it. David Hinds has been keeping the cs layer in synch with the external versions, and tons of people have helped make the low-level drivers stable again. If somebody still has a problem with the in-kernel stuff, speak up. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/