Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 25 May 2022 10:59:18 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To:     Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: provide reclaim stats via 'memory.reclaim'
Message-ID: <Yo3v5k8UBNHF6QRi@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <20220518223815.809858-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
 <YoYj4sLJfGke5IGT@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <87zgjcg4xs.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com>
 <YodDaFVeU33bu7yQ@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <CAJD7tkYwv2LDZeV2F5pxuniw7LCNjBapDCm3WuRhzwTH-jN3PA@mail.gmail.com>
 <YozFZI2euSjWPgDb@cmpxchg.org>
 <CAJD7tkZxvmnrrjc4yAe5mC+SL-MZqMkn21yjetiLYyq0B=AhtA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJD7tkZxvmnrrjc4yAe5mC+SL-MZqMkn21yjetiLYyq0B=AhtA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue 24-05-22 12:01:01, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 4:45 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 03:50:34PM -0700, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > > I think it might be useful to have a dedicated entry in memory.stat
> > > for proactively reclaimed memory. A case where this would be useful is
> > > tuning and evaluating userspace proactive reclaimers. For instance, if
> > > a userspace agent is asking the kernel to reclaim 100M, but it could
> > > only reclaim 10M, then most probably the proactive reclaimer is not
> > > using a good methodology to figure out how much memory do we need to
> > > reclaim.
> > >
> > > IMO this is more useful, and a superset of just reading the last
> > > reclaim request status through memory.reclaim (read stat before and
> > > after).
> >
> > +1
> 
> It might also be useful to have a breakdown of this by memory type:
> file, anon, or shrinkers.
> 
> It would also fit in nicely with a potential type=file/anon/shrinker
> argument to memory.reclaim. Thoughts on this?

Can we start simple and see what real usecases actually will need? 
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs