Received: by 2002:a05:6602:18e:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m14csp4173620ioo; Wed, 25 May 2022 17:20:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwMQz/qVELbF0D5AtTCbEIUsahy3+p8iS0w0lCmaiEajYD2iX4hDDulqaPTf0Q4eeP4gEc/ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5178:b0:42b:cb9c:b75f with SMTP id d24-20020a056402517800b0042bcb9cb75fmr5121607ede.15.1653524420527; Wed, 25 May 2022 17:20:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1653524420; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=I9dK9vOCPfopE8kRM09SDEOi5kHexZSinio/OUPoOL3Fkb8le44IyBQ8ezLhbSJyVv xiR8QPsbmaF6ma2e+oG+8XYj6PpnSpWVTVjR2/dHvmTE0uCEscyxGXjFItJJFq81jSCd nhI6TvR3BouOx3zsi5KfgR07kC52hOwz26RuzxHCPbg8Dw8zwLHYTeZa0wYkGutVFbgH xnUJjaJg6dzq0EI6MvtepJk8zJFxiL0tUR2eM+lPeXVHmSEJ1VsH6y53GzA8Ml+ZdRvc otEnExzuyXw4kE1H1qnbBUZTg9ajoShv/ExkvJD2m/d9qEQX7aW7bYoWucTeiTVlFN/Y 4yyg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=tQLrwjOVWdPTAmVNl8Oa/wIjk6Qom4wl7csz9KlPVIA=; b=mxJXXgWzrPZkdHURg6bRKCFS5g4UmAdI4Zl6RmWbgTk+YYDF6UQP2hXCNRMIwN29RY CW98ticoWBE8SPkRIGEc+TmXU54cw06t2UXzRbBPk8srQVAWCSGWRw70TATekttQZXRx WTs/U/GGxdMzYCDCjPr6R38+8HQar6KXmYPFUiI328Wei5t2pRFegmtEac5ecg8qgdHd fU6eXNTUJwbhz4UKImaFDSwMNpXObt+adxWjrsn0Z82j9+uMqRqQ2t89NklNH5yGVAC1 VbQ5ZHDrf+JQrEKPvHPGrnZvVeI2/1+JkyHouyrOuRHoQkFIyF9Cd6SSafbEvxNfZOCF E5Mg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=i6kUoS4w; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v13-20020a50a44d000000b00423f052f4b3si80803edb.201.2022.05.25.17.19.54; Wed, 25 May 2022 17:20:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=i6kUoS4w; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345201AbiEYVRZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 25 May 2022 17:17:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57812 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233855AbiEYVRY (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2022 17:17:24 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x235.google.com (mail-oi1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::235]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9513692AD for ; Wed, 25 May 2022 14:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x235.google.com with SMTP id e189so29203oia.8 for ; Wed, 25 May 2022 14:17:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tQLrwjOVWdPTAmVNl8Oa/wIjk6Qom4wl7csz9KlPVIA=; b=i6kUoS4w1poqdxsnZiuMb3gv1cn4miEZl3VNbmNsybdKYgpRjssVszT219S/7i09+X M5+F/Be7WYTicgyCepDowA5Dckd0fUBBgLHQBlYKBk79QCOxX4B82XbKDkrRqvjFf7Ai yoOlbQxz4Ju5n/UeQ8dhSzX39A0nsEnalDrFdgdQLRS+Jv25KeJK3P5IV6eO35MeUqqi iRg2KqA+QQoAivzTKOh7FqnLzR5nbT3NlRAiQyixMbuX3t/eRaaPca7EHR5Kddn5bH8X r/9/rHCujHcjhOEol/Ww/0Nc2OLAR5aMn1BI+hrmBiPa2Pkke2hzBN/X5NAx5RILpaVi aVqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tQLrwjOVWdPTAmVNl8Oa/wIjk6Qom4wl7csz9KlPVIA=; b=53iB0BaUoSipqmPS7bTlv3pccwv1AtRKnnZrDc/DN3L6ZMmjAl+4dVltfK3YRTO9mh 7my0vnLmGLNHB5Iada76p/TCnXy/+8xRCoV7qKxLxwS9Q+1PugQXuGM0Iu5zq1174qyT 7b2KH4f9KsFGJbnO7Emf6EaZ0jF3AOsIEzdfdGPqQvUUC1npUcgvCgeaWS7wBG5aOlpS ZmJgC5pcZNAbfplCc9DDucZXI508RYOF9AT9giI3SBMIempNulKe8CixOfLchULuX1qA dhCYOWkWH8tS7zVg/lKU4lqYrkWll31OQhoPzUdUMo3Ph3wN09ThZMX/FkYFKmE/ZF26 nONA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5336fsdK05IC3gfgQn1YQWAQvf0Wjk7vwM30Nr3rX5CtLR76jgNI igCYFezT888+aLaUVoamu5N3+MbblQyVXHZWGO4+Uw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:13c4:b0:32a:f1cb:fc12 with SMTP id d4-20020a05680813c400b0032af1cbfc12mr6485408oiw.13.1653513443045; Wed, 25 May 2022 14:17:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220525210447.2758436-1-seanjc@google.com> <20220525210447.2758436-3-seanjc@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20220525210447.2758436-3-seanjc@google.com> From: Jim Mattson Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 14:17:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: VMX: Add knob to allow rejecting kvm_intel on inconsistent VMCS config To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Joerg Roedel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chenyi Qiang , Lei Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 2:04 PM Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Add an off-by-default module param, reject_inconsistent_vmcs_config, to > allow rejecting the load of kvm_intel if an inconsistent VMCS config is > detected. Continuing on with an inconsistent, degraded config is > undesirable when the CPU is expected to support a given set of features, > e.g. can result in a misconfigured VM if userspace doesn't cross-check > KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID, and/or can result in poor performance due to > lack of fast MSR switching. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson > --- There are several inconsistent VMCS configs that are not rejected here (e.g. "enable XSAVES/XRSTORS" on a CPU that doesn't support XSAVES). Do you plan to include more checks in the future, or should this be, "reject_some_inconsistent_vmcs_configs"? :-)