Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220525154442.1438081-1-dlatypov@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220525154442.1438081-1-dlatypov@google.com>
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 May 2022 17:56:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CANiq72=hRbmHE865bwxQnCn2+kwB5nTaQgGAM0nijJnEL=3TJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] kunit: more assertion reworking
To:     Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
        David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Daniel,

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:44 PM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> wrote:
>
> Note: this does change the function signature of
> kunit_do_failed_assertion, so we'd need to update the rust wrapper in https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/blob/rust/rust/kernel/kunit.rs
> But otherwise, I don't think this series changes anything on the
> rust-side.

Thanks for the heads up! I can take care of that.

Cheers,
Miguel