Received: by 2002:a05:6602:18e:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m14csp1536055ioo; Fri, 27 May 2022 10:31:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQBQWPyRABHyVdidxHryqUdrRgvvU7fNFiiulAROv28Vvtx5Me0kRRTxY8htvyDvgA5Okk X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:c290:b0:6fe:c2b8:bb6b with SMTP id tk16-20020a170907c29000b006fec2b8bb6bmr28362266ejc.222.1653672714382; Fri, 27 May 2022 10:31:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1653672714; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mEpSi6ZdZVhaCrwyVgnpwRJLH5SbGIkSnAM9ferunMKB01UMkU/MCzE9aTu6rrS9Yd INOGanbgBrkl4+QWygxFqP/nIOmwLEtYR3J6rRAMpl1o2EvFlJn026GDbmkeCusZ09Wo MyfdoEwEKQnFt+ZR8N055kEQx+gN6R99yimu30j8iEIHhxIWqrPG2eXAzfSkdzoOifWO C/uNTAMZec0bfE1jZrisEAEgVkYMg5oTHN8Rj1PSzDIqkptU9swKQQg3IRvr3LXAX5UX Zyv37qgP4k2arcNVnxUjdI8x8L9AJNgDIi7/QSzNOCuZefyFJFdyTBENpV/SJrEtCWaH MiGw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=l4fKDERpiICSOVgCQ8QwCarZ+nXg0XUnq0ATowURuHc=; b=uOARf/x3q0I6aVkW4BcEpQL097HMD2NKc5Y2dIqUK/K3gxZLvrmX1fdS5aGh8Yi3t+ 4VsYY9nuR1NMFy2eWwOpBrEFQ/3Uf3Kl4ZTLgQe/mMGbzBx+rilahGVvx/T0dEFlTBIU zaV5Rq0Lwk15BivoRJhD3p79+iy2rM/aicztudzoSFlAgnhywfkf5R1oxTuD4IO9qDdI TzMl/gsK10Gfny9tfSNor4zGqcTx78v1sAIJUanPb2ZVLwJWCI5gu6oJuNELTYGqrPgY c6rif32KbVySWogigutQpj+hA4dXbRK18mHfYz/Gdc52srx5owb8Ifix1jRTNlwkE0hK wBCQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=dzwK7kFg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id nc9-20020a1709071c0900b006f3b713a043si5110848ejc.273.2022.05.27.10.31.26; Fri, 27 May 2022 10:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=dzwK7kFg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345434AbiEYXyS (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 25 May 2022 19:54:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33884 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229824AbiEYXyP (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2022 19:54:15 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 147B69D070; Wed, 25 May 2022 16:54:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=l4fKDERpiICSOVgCQ8QwCarZ+nXg0XUnq0ATowURuHc=; b=dzwK7kFgMsM4dtgzFXJxmWXZFa u+Q7RFwB4jvwWWz8PwBDLQpHj4ZK0YGZiyHU+lI4x2bdXw5XdPK1jJ4rxeSbi0iM9LtMiUjwiCMGK sk07Lf4YOWErKZDftjL5EUS6bSB+I4To98jq/cbHVJYzq336XwpuNwFstUEWVUW911uW9NiZh86Dl glQIo5lGtlpAyKujL6jZzNtS5izUCyWSs8RcUticJXAxL0UBNTsem/IXOFrXk02tosz4FEzKSD99r HjN3iYpVp6vLptw5OEzyRio/9aMzIA5bMm9QOG5QhrN7Gz3D7nlgWgRVNkbVz4ahCkN4/pjws9RbT LUmv21/A==; Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nu0pC-00CynK-Py; Wed, 25 May 2022 23:53:58 +0000 Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 16:53:58 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Richard Fontana , tj@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jeyu@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, bvanassche@acm.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, joe@perches.com, keescook@chromium.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, minchan@kernel.org, linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Goldwyn Rodrigues , Kuno Woudt , copyleft-next@lists.fedorahosted.org, Ciaran Farrell , Christopher De Nicolo , Christoph Hellwig , Jonathan Corbet , Thorsten Leemhuis Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license Message-ID: References: <20211029184500.2821444-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20211029184500.2821444-2-mcgrof@kernel.org> <87ee0k0wrn.ffs@tglx> <874k1dz674.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874k1dz674.ffs@tglx> Sender: Luis Chamberlain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:51:43PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, May 25 2022 at 09:57, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 11:22:36PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> This paragraph is not really understandable for Joe Developer. > >> > >> copyleft-next-0.3.1 is explicitly compatible with GPLv2 (or later) and > >> can therefore be used for kernel code. Though the best and recommended > >> practice is to express this in the SPDX license identifier by > >> licensing the code under both licenses expressed by the OR operator. > >> > >> Hmm? > > > > Let me try clarifying this further, how about: > > > > copyleft-next-0.3.1 is explicitly compatible with GPLv2 (or later) and > > can therefore be used for kernel code. Despite this, if you use > > copyleft-next-0.3.1 on Linux, the recommended practice is to express > > dual licensing with GPL using in the SPDX license identifiers by > > using by the OR operator. > > 'using in the ..' ? > > and > > 'by using by' is off by one 'by' :) > > I'm not seeing how that clarifies stuff further. I might be biased, but > the version I suggested is crystal clear. Oh sorry, I didn't realize the paragraph you posted was a suggestion, I thought it was the one you were indicating needed further enhancement! I'll just take yours then. > >> > + To use the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license put the following SPDX tag/value > >> > + pair into a comment according to the placement guidelines in the > >> > + licensing rules documentation: > >> > + SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR copyleft-next-0.3.1 > >> > + SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR copyleft-next 0.3.1 > >> > + SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ OR copyleft-next-0.3.1 > >> > + SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR copyleft-next-0.3.1 > >> > >> Please don't propagate the GPL-2.0 and GPL-2.0+ tags. They are > >> outdated (still valid) in the SPDX spec, which reminds me that I should > >> update the relevant documentation... > > > > OK thanks for the recommendation, I'll leave it at: > > > > + SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR copyleft-next-0.3.1 > > SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR copyleft-next-0.3.1 > > please. See my previous reply quoted above. > > > + SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR copyleft-next-0.3.1 Sorry I hadn't had my coffee yet so I should only list: SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR copyleft-next 0.3.1 SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR copyleft-next-0.3.1 Will do this on the next spin. Luis