Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Message-ID: <c6ef4c847aecbe12cc2bd71509c0359aade18fcc.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: change printk(KERN_<LEVEL>.. to pr_<level>()
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     Yu Zhe <yuzhe@nfschina.com>, mingo@redhat.com,
        peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
        bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        liqiong@nfschina.com
Date:   Thu, 26 May 2022 02:42:35 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20220526091031.3741819-1-yuzhe@nfschina.com>
References: <20220526091031.3741819-1-yuzhe@nfschina.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4-1ubuntu2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 2022-05-26 at 02:10 -0700, Yu Zhe wrote:
> Prefer pr_<level>(...  to printk(KERN_<LEVEL> ..., change them.

Do remember that checkpatch is just a guide and isn't always correct.

You are responsible for verifying that anything it suggests is
converted properly.

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
[]
> @@ -9370,7 +9370,7 @@ static void dump_rq_tasks(struct rq *rq, const char *loglvl)
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
>  
> -	printk("%sCPU%d enqueued tasks (%u total):\n", loglvl, cpu, rq->nr_running);
> +	pr_warn("%sCPU%d enqueued tasks (%u total):\n", loglvl, cpu, rq->nr_running);

This is _not_ a good change.

Do please look to see what loglvl is and if this change is appropriate.

>  	for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
>  		if (task_cpu(p) != cpu)
>  			continue;
> @@ -9378,7 +9378,7 @@ static void dump_rq_tasks(struct rq *rq, const char *loglvl)
>  		if (!task_on_rq_queued(p))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		printk("%s\tpid: %d, name: %s\n", loglvl, p->pid, p->comm);
> +		pr_warn("%s\tpid: %d, name: %s\n", loglvl, p->pid, p->comm);

here too.