Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
To:     ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc:     martin.botka@somainline.org,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org,
        marijn.suijten@somainline.org, jamipkettunen@somainline.org,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] iommu/qcom: Add support for QCIOMMUv2 and QCIOMMU-500 secured contexts
Date:   Fri, 27 May 2022 23:29:01 +0200
Message-Id: <20220527212901.29268-7-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220527212901.29268-1-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
References: <20220527212901.29268-1-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>

This IOMMU is yet another Qualcomm variant of known IOMMUs, found in
Family-B SoCs, such as MSM8956, MSM8976, MSM8953, MSM8917 and others,
and that firmware perfectly adheres to this driver logic.
This time, though, the catch is that the secure contexts are also
secured, meaning that these are programmed by the bootloader or TZ
and their "interesting" registers are locked out, so the hypervisor
disallows touching them from the non-secure world: in this case
the OS is supposed to blindly trust the secure configuration of
these contexts and just use them "as they are".

For this reason, it is necessary to distinguish between the v1 and
500/v2 secure contexts in this driver in order to adhere to this
specification. To do this, add a new DT compatible, named
"qcom,msm-iommu-v2-sec" that will trigger the new behavior.

For the sake of completeness, also add a "qcom,msm-iommu-v2-ns" so
that the human eye gets pleased with it when reading the contexts
in the final SoC DT. Of course, the latter is just cosmetic.

Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>
Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/iommu/qcom,iommu.txt   |  2 ++
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/qcom_iommu.c        | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/qcom,iommu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/qcom,iommu.txt
index 72ae0595efff..861c0cd9c512 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/qcom,iommu.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/qcom,iommu.txt
@@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ to non-secure vs secure interrupt line.
   - compatible     : Should be one of:
         - "qcom,msm-iommu-v1-ns"  : non-secure context bank
         - "qcom,msm-iommu-v1-sec" : secure context bank
+        - "qcom,msm-iommu-v2-ns"  : non-secure QSMMUv2/QSMMU500 context bank
+        - "qcom,msm-iommu-v2-sec" : secure QSMMUv2/QSMMU500 context bank
   - reg            : Base address and size of context bank within the iommu
   - interrupts     : The context fault irq.
 
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/qcom_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/qcom_iommu.c
index 4fefbab15b71..aa7359ae34a9 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/qcom_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/qcom_iommu.c
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ struct qcom_iommu_ctx {
 	struct device		*dev;
 	void __iomem		*base;
 	bool			 secure_init;
+	bool			 secured_ctx;
 	u8			 asid;      /* asid and ctx bank # are 1:1 */
 	struct iommu_domain	*domain;
 };
@@ -309,6 +310,12 @@ static int qcom_iommu_init_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 			ctx->secure_init = true;
 		}
 
+		/* Secured QSMMU-500/QSMMU-v2 contexts cannot be programmed */
+		if (ctx->secured_ctx) {
+			ctx->domain = domain;
+			break;
+		}
+
 		qcom_iommu_reset_ctx(ctx);
 
 
@@ -751,10 +758,14 @@ static int qcom_iommu_ctx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (irq < 0)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
+	if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,msm-iommu-v2-sec"))
+		ctx->secured_ctx = true;
+
 	/* clear IRQs before registering fault handler, just in case the
 	 * boot-loader left us a surprise:
 	 */
-	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR, iommu_readl(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR));
+	if (!ctx->secured_ctx)
+		iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR, iommu_readl(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR));
 
 	ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq,
 			       qcom_iommu_fault,
@@ -796,6 +807,8 @@ static int qcom_iommu_ctx_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static const struct of_device_id ctx_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm-iommu-v1-ns" },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm-iommu-v1-sec" },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm-iommu-v2-ns" },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm-iommu-v2-sec" },
 	{ /* sentinel */ }
 };
 
@@ -813,7 +826,8 @@ static bool qcom_iommu_has_secure_context(struct qcom_iommu_dev *qcom_iommu)
 	struct device_node *child;
 
 	for_each_child_of_node(qcom_iommu->dev->of_node, child)
-		if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "qcom,msm-iommu-v1-sec"))
+		if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "qcom,msm-iommu-v1-sec") ||
+		    of_device_is_compatible(child, "qcom,msm-iommu-v2-sec"))
 			return true;
 
 	return false;
-- 
2.36.1