Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756838AbXEQLjr (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 07:39:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755355AbXEQLjj (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 07:39:39 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.183]:50102 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755513AbXEQLji convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 07:39:38 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: =?utf-8?q?J=C3=B6rn_Engel?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 13:39:15 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: John Stoffel , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, Albert Cahalan , Thomas Gleixner , Jan Engelhardt , Evgeniy Polyakov , Pekka Enberg , Greg KH , Ingo Oeser References: <20070515151919.GA32510@lazybastard.org> <17994.1241.436841.681216@stoffel.org> <20070515191926.GB1220@lazybastard.org> In-Reply-To: <20070515191926.GB1220@lazybastard.org> X-Face: >j"dOR3XO=^3iw?0`(E1wZ/&le9!.ok[JrI=S~VlsF~}"P\+jx.GT@=?utf-8?q?=0A=09-oaEG?=,9Ba>v;3>:kcw#yO5?B:l{(Ln.2)=?utf-8?q?=27=7Dfw07+4-=26=5E=7CScOpE=3F=5D=5EXdv=5B/zWkA7=60=25M!DxZ=0A=09?= =?utf-8?q?8MJ=2EU5?="hi+2yT(k`PF~Zt;tfT,i,JXf=x@eLP{7B:"GyA\=UnN) =?utf-8?q?=26=26qdaA=3A=7D-Y*=7D=3A3YvzV9=0A=09=7E=273a=7E7I=7CWQ=5D?=<50*%U-6Ewmxfzdn/CK_E/ouMU(r?FAQG/ev^JyuX.%(By`" =?utf-8?q?L=5F=0A=09H=3Dbj?=)"y7*XOqz|SS"mrZ$`Q_syCd MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705171339.16806.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1++bYoXzM/V7OY7dCNTkqJbADI1RmVN+fouEBU pYBmdwHtQjy9YLIE3zTZEX0lw6pqc0A+JSVrjLutXLRz2fPPBv tB1vKQ+cSe3AaDCBwYAow== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1229 Lines: 30 On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Jörn Engel wrote: > > > I've been semi watching this, and the only comment I really can give > > is that I hate the name.  To me, logfs implies a filesystem for > > logging purposes, not for Flash hardware with wear leveling issues to > > be taken into account. > > Yeah, well, ... > > Two years ago when I started all this, I was looking for a good name. > All I could come up with sounded stupid, so I picked "LogFS" as a code > name.  As soon as I find a better name, the code name should get > replaced. > When doing a google search on logfs, there are less than five results among the first 100 that don't refer to your work. The other two listed in there are also log-structured file systems: The inferno flash file system (http://inferno-os.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/liblogfs/) and the (discontinued) file system named lfs from the 2005 google summer of code. I'd say the name should stay, changing it now can only add more confusion. Arnd <>< - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/