Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Sat, 28 May 2022 16:29:17 +0100
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/163] 5.10.119-rc1 review
Message-ID: <YpI/zcih1HvyobxC@debian>
References: <20220527084828.156494029@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220527084828.156494029@linuxfoundation.org>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Greg,

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 10:48:00AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.119 release.
> There are 163 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 29 May 2022 08:46:26 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.3.1 20220517): 63 configs -> no failure
arm (gcc version 11.3.1 20220517): 105 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.3.1 20220517): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.3.1 20220517): 4 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1218
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1220


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip