Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758842AbXEQSUu (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 14:20:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754483AbXEQSUn (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 14:20:43 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:54698 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753931AbXEQSUm (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 14:20:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:18:38 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: dedekind@infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros Message-Id: <20070517111838.842a29ca.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1179424006.3642.84.camel@sauron> References: <20070517143200.GA30850@lst.de> <1179413443.3642.49.camel@sauron> <20070517145653.GA968@lst.de> <1179414590.3642.69.camel@sauron> <20070517102931.6bbbad1a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1179424006.3642.84.camel@sauron> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1404 Lines: 34 On Thu, 17 May 2007 20:46:46 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 10:29 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > umm.. I'd say what you've done in there is an improvement to the exiting > > stuff: getting gcc to check it is better than having to use sparse. > > > > I'd have expected gcc to generate poorer code with your approach but I'm > > showing zero text size changes from Christoph's patch (gcc-4.1 and > > gcc-3.4.5). > > > > So I wouldn't be averse to creating a new, generic, kernel-wide alternative > > to the existing __be32/__le32/etc code. It is an improvement. > > > > We could conceivably simply switch the existing stuff to use structs, but > > quite a lot of code assumes that cpu_to_foo32(0) == 0 and just does > > open-coded assigments of zero. They'd need fixups. > > Andrew, > > thanks for answer. I personally do not think this should be applied > before we have better __be32 and friends. Thus, if I can do so, I will > just sit and wait for your decision - whether you include this patch to > -mm or not :-) . > Drat, and here was I hoping I'd lured you into implementing the generic code. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/