Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220519133015.484639-1-robimarko@gmail.com> <20220524022243.GA2625732-robh@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220524022243.GA2625732-robh@kernel.org>
From:   Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 May 2022 19:09:56 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOX2RU4JED8144JuVWtQyF9opqseUviDU7Z-an6eKVy_A=A_-A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] dt-bindings: regulator: qcom,spmi-regulator:
 Convert to dtschema
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 24 May 2022 at 04:22, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 03:30:09PM +0200, Robert Marko wrote:
> > Convert the bindings of Qualcomm SPMI regulators to DT schema.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > * Remove blank interrupts and interrupt-names as generic properties
> > to only allow them per compatible
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > * Remove quotes around refs
> > * Use much stricter regex for regulator node matching
> > * Add supply matching per compatible
> > * Add blank interrupts and interrupt-names as generic properties
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > * Remove the forgotten text bindings
> > * Move allOf after patternProperties
> > * Use my private email as the maintainer email
> >
> > I am aware that syscon alone is not really acceptable, its converted
> > directly from the old text bindings.
> >
> > Any advice on how to solve this is appreciated.
>
> Add a compatible for the block in question, but that means you have to
> have a schema for it. Or you can just drop the node. This binding isn't
> really about that node.

Sorry for the late reply,
I think I will just remove the example node to not complicate the
series further.

Regards,
Robert
>
> Rob