Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760275AbXEQW4G (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 18:56:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757290AbXEQWzx (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 18:55:53 -0400 Received: from 203-97-71-235.dsl.clear.net.nz ([203.97.71.235]:55621 "EHLO gazelle.ad.endace.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756082AbXEQWzv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 18:55:51 -0400 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 10:55:48 +1200 Message-ID: <659F626D666070439A4A5965CD6EBF406B352A@gazelle.ad.endace.com> In-Reply-To: <659F626D666070439A4A5965CD6EBF406B348A@gazelle.ad.endace.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB Thread-Index: AceYRKGV0QiTznLZS6GN06MsyAXZ0QAAMFMgACQ2lYA= References: <659F626D666070439A4A5965CD6EBF406836C6@gazelle.ad.endace.com><6bffcb0e0705151629j78920ca2r9337dccdfc1bb6a9@mail.gmail.com><17994.19043.771733.453896@notabene.brown><659F626D666070439A4A5965CD6EBF406B31C5@gazelle.ad.endace.com><17995.42562.870806.396617@notabene.brown><659F626D666070439A4A5965CD6EBF406B33ED@gazelle.ad.endace.com><17995.49602.427417.500049@notabene.brown><17995.57891.56738.592100@notabene.brown> <17995.59547.368508.202596@notabene.brown> <659F626D666070439A4A5965CD6EBF406B348A@gazelle.ad.endace.com> From: "Jeff Zheng" To: "Neil Brown" , , "Michal Piotrowski" , "Ingo Molnar" , , , Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3322 Lines: 98 Fix confirmed, filled the whole 11T hard disk, without crashing. I presume this would go into 2.6.22 Thanks again. Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Zheng > Sent: Thursday, 17 May 2007 5:39 p.m. > To: Neil Brown; david@lang.hm; Michal Piotrowski; Ingo > Molnar; linux-raid@vger.kernel.org; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when > each disk is 5TB > > > Yeah, seems you've locked it down, :D. I've written 600GB of > data now, and anything is still fine. > Will let it run overnight, and fill the whole 11T. I'll post > the result tomorrow > > Thanks a lot though. > > Jeff > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Neil Brown [mailto:neilb@suse.de] > > Sent: Thursday, 17 May 2007 5:31 p.m. > > To: david@lang.hm; Jeff Zheng; Michal Piotrowski; Ingo Molnar; > > linux-raid@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, > when each disk > > is 5TB > > > > On Thursday May 17, neilb@suse.de wrote: > > > > > > Uhm, I just noticed something. > > > 'chunk' is unsigned long, and when it gets shifted up, we > > might lose > > > bits. That could still happen with the 4*2.75T > arrangement, but is > > > much more likely in the 2*5.5T arrangement. > > > > Actually, it cannot be a problem with the 4*2.75T arrangement. > > chuck << chunksize_bits > > > > will not exceed the size of the underlying device *in*kilobytes*. > > In that case that is 0xAE9EC800 which will git in a 32bit long. > > We don't double it to make sectors until after we add > > zone->dev_offset, which is "sector_t" and so 64bit > arithmetic is used. > > > > So I'm quite certain this bug will cause exactly the problems > > experienced!! > > > > > > > > Jeff, can you try this patch? > > > > Don't bother about the other tests I mentioned, just try this one. > > Thanks. > > > > NeilBrown > > > > > Signed-off-by: Neil Brown > > > > > > ### Diffstat output > > > ./drivers/md/raid0.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff .prev/drivers/md/raid0.c ./drivers/md/raid0.c > > > --- .prev/drivers/md/raid0.c 2007-05-17 > > 10:33:30.000000000 +1000 > > > +++ ./drivers/md/raid0.c 2007-05-17 15:02:15.000000000 +1000 > > > @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static int raid0_make_request (request_q > > > x = block >> chunksize_bits; > > > tmp_dev = zone->dev[sector_div(x, zone->nb_dev)]; > > > } > > > - rsect = (((chunk << chunksize_bits) + zone->dev_offset)<<1) > > > + rsect = ((((sector_t)chunk << chunksize_bits) + > > > +zone->dev_offset)<<1) > > > + sect_in_chunk; > > > > > > bio->bi_bdev = tmp_dev->bdev; > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-raid" in the body of a message to > majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/