Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Tue, 31 May 2022 17:16:16 -0400
From:   =?utf-8?B?TsOtY29sYXMgRi4gUi4gQS4=?= Prado 
        <nfraprado@collabora.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, kernel@collabora.com,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8192: Add
 drive-strength-microamp
Message-ID: <20220531211616.vq73g6r4vrxxahqe@notapiano>
References: <20220525155714.1837360-1-nfraprado@collabora.com>
 <20220525155714.1837360-2-nfraprado@collabora.com>
 <CAGXv+5FRAvJpn-Nz08NLzqj+X+-yXLx6w-Bz7qa9g8Ct5xTNYg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAGXv+5FRAvJpn-Nz08NLzqj+X+-yXLx6w-Bz7qa9g8Ct5xTNYg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 04:48:51PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 11:58 PM N?colas F. R. A. Prado
> <nfraprado@collabora.com> wrote:
> >
> > Commit e5fabbe43f3f ("pinctrl: mediatek: paris: Support generic
> > PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH_UA") added support for using
> > drive-strength-microamp instead of mediatek,drive-strength-adv.
> >
> > Since there aren't any users of mediatek,drive-strength-adv on mt8192
> > yet, remove this property and add drive-strength-microamp in its place,
> > which has a clearer meaning.
> 
> Cool! Thanks for taking care of this~ I was looking at this and tried
> to make drive-strength and drive-strength-microamp mutually exclusive,
> but since they are optional, it didn't really work, and I put it on the
> back burner.

I didn't think of enforcing the properties to be mutually exclusive in the
dt-binding, but that is indeed a good idea. After a bit of head-scratching seems
like it is possible although unintuitive (by using 'required' inside the if
block). I'll send a v2 with this restriction added, and the same thing for patch
2, since bias-pull-up/down also shouldn't be used together with bias-disable.

Thanks,
N?colas

> 
> 
> ChenYu