Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <b1b87be5-a048-b713-c9f2-84b948aa6718@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 2 Jun 2022 08:37:43 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/2] clk: hisilicon: add CRG driver Hi3521a SoC
Content-Language: en-US
To:     "Marty E. Plummer" <hanetzer@startmail.com>
Cc:     arnd@arndb.de, cai.huoqing@linux.dev, christian.koenig@amd.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, gengdongjiu@huawei.com,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        linux@armlinux.org.uk, michael@walle.cc, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com,
        mturquette@baylibre.com, novikov@ispras.ru, olof@lixom.net,
        p.yadav@ti.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, richard@nod.at,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, soc@kernel.org,
        sumit.semwal@linaro.org, tudor.ambarus@microchip.com,
        vigneshr@ti.com, xuwei5@hisilicon.com
References: <20220501054440.2434247-1-hanetzer@startmail.com>
 <20220501173423.2473093-1-hanetzer@startmail.com>
 <20220501173423.2473093-2-hanetzer@startmail.com>
 <f42cb4d0-7133-eea5-b456-b5169bebfad1@linaro.org>
 <20220601105846.7hriawg3stxb657f@proprietary-killer>
 <630b0d13-6778-2508-6a34-9daa0358047d@linaro.org>
 <20220601110616.xmxih663kxgupszv@proprietary-killer>
 <a2a98c6d-2ff7-89f6-0711-c8f8b99e85c2@linaro.org>
 <20220601182418.okoofgannw6vbcxo@proprietary-killer>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220601182418.okoofgannw6vbcxo@proprietary-killer>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 01/06/2022 20:24, Marty E. Plummer wrote:

>>> Either or. Whatever makes the workload easier is what I'm looking for.
>>
>> Sorry, you need to be more specific. Apply is not a job for you, for the
>> patch submitter.
>>
>> Then you miss here important piece - which is the first patch. DTS goes
>> always via separate branch (or even tree) from driver changes. That's
>> why bindings are always separate first patches.
>>
> So, add a 4: arch/arm/boot/dts/soc.dtsi and 5: arch/arm/boot/dts/board.dts
> to the above list, or should those be the same patch as well?

For me does not matter, sub architecture maintainer might have preference.

Best regards,
Krzysztof