Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:16:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:16:45 -0500 Received: from okcforum.org ([207.43.150.207]:54021 "EHLO okcforum.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:16:32 -0500 Subject: Re: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16 revisited From: "Nathan G. Grennan" To: Oktay Akbal Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.99.2 (Preview Release) Date: 29 Nov 2001 12:16:07 -0600 Message-Id: <1007057769.1528.7.camel@cygnusx-1.okcforum.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 12:09, Oktay Akbal wrote: > Why do you think that fstab matters for root-fs ? root-fs needs to be > mounted to read fstab. So autodetection must be done for root-fs. > And if the fs has a journal it is ext3. If you do not want that behaviour > you might use a option to lilo, but I don't know of any option to specify > the root-fs-tyoe. Or you need to use an initrd to mount explicit as ext2 > and pivot-root it to / ? > > -- > Oktay Akbal Actually, I think it should respect fstab. It does mount it, then fsck it while mounted read-only, then remounts(key point) read-write. IMHO it should remount it with whatever fstab says. I realize this could be a little tricky, but I bet doable. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/