Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762046AbXERLTT (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 07:19:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754443AbXERLTN (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 07:19:13 -0400 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:46219 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753170AbXERLTN (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 07:19:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 05:19:11 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Satyam Sharma Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning Message-ID: <20070518111911.GP10562@parisc-linux.org> References: <20070517172023.GL10562@parisc-linux.org> <20070517182414.GA12170@infradead.org> <20070517185115.GA13207@infradead.org> <20070517193953.GM10562@parisc-linux.org> <20070517194326.GC30571@kvack.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 738 Lines: 16 On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:11:58AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > It's also somewhat a matter of *taste* (and hence subjective), if you > _still_ don't get it, Matthew, then there's no point continuing this thread > and trying to convince you ad infinitum. Right. It's a matter of taste. What makes you think you have taste? I don't think that the module solution is perfect. But abusing the module parameters is a worse idea. sysfs just isn't a good fit for this, according to my taste. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/