Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
        Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
        Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v5 2/4] PCI: Move jailhouse's isolated function handling to pci_scan_slot()
Date:   Thu,  2 Jun 2022 12:30:14 +0200
Message-Id: <20220602103016.1499031-3-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220602103016.1499031-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20220602103016.1499031-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

The special case of the jailhouse hypervisor passing through individual
PCI functions handles scanning for PCI functions even if function 0 does
not exist. Currently this is done with an extra loop duplicating the one
in pci_scan_slot(). By incorporating the check for jailhouse_paravirt()
into pci_scan_slot() we can instead do this as part of the normal
slot scan. Note that with the assignment of dev->multifunction gated by
fn > 0 we set dev->multifunction unconditionally for all functions if
function 0 is missing just as in the existing jailhouse loop.

The only functional change is that we now call
pcie_aspm_init_link_state() for these functions but this already
happened if function 0 was passed through and should not be a problem.

Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220408224514.GA353445@bhelgaas/
Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/pci/probe.c | 30 ++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 78aa1bccab2f..3029edc68ff7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -2658,8 +2658,13 @@ int pci_scan_slot(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
 			if (fn > 0)
 				dev->multifunction = 1;
 		} else if (fn == 0) {
-			/* function 0 is required */
-			break;
+			/*
+			 * function 0 is required unless we are running on
+			 * a hypervisor which passes through individual PCI
+			 * functions.
+			 */
+			if (!jailhouse_paravirt())
+				break;
 		}
 		fn = next_fn(bus, dev, fn);
 	} while (fn >= 0);
@@ -2858,29 +2863,14 @@ static unsigned int pci_scan_child_bus_extend(struct pci_bus *bus,
 {
 	unsigned int used_buses, normal_bridges = 0, hotplug_bridges = 0;
 	unsigned int start = bus->busn_res.start;
-	unsigned int devfn, fn, cmax, max = start;
+	unsigned int devfn, cmax, max = start;
 	struct pci_dev *dev;
-	int nr_devs;
 
 	dev_dbg(&bus->dev, "scanning bus\n");
 
 	/* Go find them, Rover! */
-	for (devfn = 0; devfn < 256; devfn += 8) {
-		nr_devs = pci_scan_slot(bus, devfn);
-
-		/*
-		 * The Jailhouse hypervisor may pass individual functions of a
-		 * multi-function device to a guest without passing function 0.
-		 * Look for them as well.
-		 */
-		if (jailhouse_paravirt() && nr_devs == 0) {
-			for (fn = 1; fn < 8; fn++) {
-				dev = pci_scan_single_device(bus, devfn + fn);
-				if (dev)
-					dev->multifunction = 1;
-			}
-		}
-	}
+	for (devfn = 0; devfn < 256; devfn += 8)
+		pci_scan_slot(bus, devfn);
 
 	/* Reserve buses for SR-IOV capability */
 	used_buses = pci_iov_bus_range(bus);
-- 
2.32.0