Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 2 Jun 2022 10:47:03 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc:     Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>,
        Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, linmiaohe@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSETS] v14 fsdax-rmap + v11 fsdax-reflink
Message-Id: <20220602104703.c5af5abde1d9b867d6aed9c7@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <Ypjw0bldEIFp9+YG@magnolia>
References: <20220511000352.GY27195@magnolia>
        <20220511014818.GE1098723@dread.disaster.area>
        <CAPcyv4h0a3aT3XH9qCBW3nbT4K3EwQvBSD_oX5W=55_x24-wFA@mail.gmail.com>
        <20220510192853.410ea7587f04694038cd01de@linux-foundation.org>
        <20220511024301.GD27195@magnolia>
        <20220510222428.0cc8a50bd007474c97b050b2@linux-foundation.org>
        <20220511151955.GC27212@magnolia>
        <CAPcyv4gwV5ReuCUbJHZPVPUJjnaGFWibCLLsH-XEgyvbn9RkWA@mail.gmail.com>
        <32f51223-c671-1dc0-e14a-8887863d9071@fujitsu.com>
        <1007e895-a0e3-9a82-2524-bb7e8a0b6b8c@fujitsu.com>
        <Ypjw0bldEIFp9+YG@magnolia>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 10:18:09 -0700 "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:42:13PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Is there any other work I should do with these two patchsets?  I think they
> > are good for now.  So... since the 5.19-rc1 is coming, could the
> > notify_failure() part be merged as your plan?
> 
> Hmm.  I don't see any of the patches 1-5,7-13 in current upstream, so
> I'm guessing this means Andrew isn't taking it for 5.19?

Sorry, the volume of commentary led me to believe that it wasn't
considered finalized.  Shall take a look now.