Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760631AbXEROfi (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 10:35:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755321AbXEROfb (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 10:35:31 -0400 Received: from ribosome.natur.cuni.cz ([195.113.57.20]:36472 "EHLO ribosome.natur.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755382AbXEROfa (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 10:35:30 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:35:29 +0200 From: Martin Mokrejs To: Jesper Juhl Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext3-users@redhat.com Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc1 killed my ext3 filesystem cleanly unmounted Message-ID: <20070518143529.GB14611@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz> References: <20070518090604.GA10841@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz> <9a8748490705180720u3baf9785l910581a2a76a6eb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9a8748490705180720u3baf9785l910581a2a76a6eb@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1649 Lines: 32 On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 04:20:39PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > On 18/05/07, Martin Mokrejs wrote: > > Hi, > > I just tried the 2.6.22-r1 candidate to test whether some bug I have > > hit in the past still exists. I did use 2.6.20.6 so far. So, I have > > cleanly rebooted to use the new kernel, after the machine came up I > > tried to mess with the bug, and had to reboot again to play with kernel > > commandline parameters. Unfortunately, on the next reboot fsck was > > schedules on my filesystem after 38 clean mounts. :( And the problem > > started. The fsck found some unused inodes, but probably did not know > > where do they belong to, but it deleted them automagically. Finally, the > > fsck died because it cannot fine some '..' entry. > > > > How do you know that the corruption was caused by 2.6.21-rc1 ? > Isn't it possible that the corruption was created by an earlier > kernel, but only detected when a forced fsck was run - which just > happened to be while you were running 2.6.21-rc1 ... > > My point is that, as far as I can see, there's nothing tying > 2.6.21-rc1 specifically to this corruption... or? You might be right, but I thought maybe more probably is the cause in kernel as that is what I have changed recently. ;) Or maybe someone can at leats say "No, no changes to be considered between 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.22-rc1.". ;) Martin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/