Received: by 2002:a05:6602:18e:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m14csp7723165ioo; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 12:04:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxgDyZES4Umm4EWxMwgdwNJWB9Kae4p5uXq4yu3i4tHe4W/AAKfgDbYDYBj+JkiKsNwiul3 X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:249:b0:163:6dc0:b8b3 with SMTP id j9-20020a170903024900b001636dc0b8b3mr11404024plh.24.1654283090500; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 12:04:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1654283090; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zQOfLohydh8YqeI2vZQXlk/vULcqiwChnv7lCGsrgpRX24OIQsn0TXxi11zj+oW1ku u5PUbDo1XdckkQgHm/Nm8pYENwX/pncN6N85lUkZuHh0WZ+Uo4FdG3a0bCq8ztTdJAXV dzrHCthADM31eQtay3hITPWj0aIJwuIcsklPMpaKwRqmhw1mT58fQpEVqGC7yhvx09QM bwJ61GEZwVUpQZLw9eedBvAVAvXXxMZgV3+fPcjqnlKiQTyoyjCp3togMjemIsvznJcB 6TO813p9PIkmyyAHKSbAIACBQ5LQSrTget3rWSSZxMQO/ClJQA6HNg3VU0k5NHgZiW99 sjeQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=DgsBHx9IzQz0gKh7wg/SYVVq1u+u8lL7fYTKGTKWJYY=; b=R7dOnJTRKVVkLnsEDbJXUibyYoDQYKwXAaqhs5eXNUAGEjwB6562pP8prS5UcrzYlR XejDRNAkajIzJ88BYMUJetgt/1qGRDAKSKxfJGgfRvcJjOR625fmPranSjRJeXmFfIu0 3MjFGR7N9G3JqnbEMVdMe14edEt9Gu8D3XC6OJ8gdLhq0Kd21w5yUmoJc9niN8DubLBE kkP2JEjHsuwDIAx0ncRs04l7M//ExtDwHbcTvL/rlhDMVaj4uC0GdjHYWnsxi2LEFlSc 48lxLf1t/cPlEePiIENb1X9DIZI2aDa3tyD+VhF4y2/S844iSw1od4DqWZVVudEoZnyd xaQQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=gIdkVXHh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u134-20020a63798c000000b003fa4c5f94b1si8923330pgc.519.2022.06.03.12.04.35; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 12:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=gIdkVXHh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238528AbiFBTUx (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 2 Jun 2022 15:20:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40810 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238565AbiFBTUD (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2022 15:20:03 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF0241929D; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 12:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 252J2AQY001905; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 19:19:47 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=DgsBHx9IzQz0gKh7wg/SYVVq1u+u8lL7fYTKGTKWJYY=; b=gIdkVXHhJCAjBbZ9s0J4sd3sjP/YEaX9VKB48B+zDg2SV+EUF+OV1xSStKardn5QE9HD 6mrJeFWxeRa2LEM0fT84C1seiGAThWmkyv1IF2h4B6GjU/0LBcQSdBUf3pq8Q27Tawip AORaVZPikGzTpyDiYkK1Duw4xUNEB8fcSD+8wk5RbkSNimxzwUUV5pungDZNKJvOnhyY hYip1f0kXYxOHCj8zfFTkTMmR3d45IXy2oYgpKuj8oyMOdE04idJcyrJAYX8+mjYm9Mr tqFKw1BAi+f2Vhx3e7dh44yxB5O4Q6e7A3R5js/GUGJNniUmeUESx1gYjDYaaYTW/haS 4Q== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gf30v89cy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 02 Jun 2022 19:19:47 +0000 Received: from m0127361.ppops.net (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 252JAiU4034651; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 19:19:46 GMT Received: from ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (1b.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.27]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gf30v89cr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 02 Jun 2022 19:19:46 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 252J5iD8007634; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 19:19:45 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07027.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.14]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3gds40e9d0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 02 Jun 2022 19:19:45 +0000 Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.233]) by b03cxnp07027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 252JJiT79830688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 2 Jun 2022 19:19:44 GMT Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8F013605E; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 19:19:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8743D136061; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 19:19:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.160.37.241] (unknown [9.160.37.241]) by b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 19:19:43 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 15:19:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 15/20] s390/vfio-ap: implement in-use callback for vfio_ap driver Content-Language: en-US To: jjherne@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: freude@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, fiuczy@linux.ibm.com References: <20220404221039.1272245-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <20220404221039.1272245-16-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <6a574d7e-c390-3764-a57c-23c7653f2f69@linux.ibm.com> From: Tony Krowiak In-Reply-To: <6a574d7e-c390-3764-a57c-23c7653f2f69@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 6_uWuS3Wv6BwcNhPdbQCMwLD6Zbk1zAC X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: CxBK6P8bLHASdqS1p5y7v-t2HKi3x5zM X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.874,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-06-02_05,2022-06-02_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206020081 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/2/22 2:16 PM, Jason J. Herne wrote: > On 4/4/22 18:10, Tony Krowiak wrote: >> Let's implement the callback to indicate when an APQN >> is in use by the vfio_ap device driver. The callback is >> invoked whenever a change to the apmask or aqmask would >> result in one or more queue devices being removed from the driver. The >> vfio_ap device driver will indicate a resource is in use >> if the APQN of any of the queue devices to be removed are assigned to >> any of the matrix mdevs under the driver's control. >> >> There is potential for a deadlock condition between the >> matrix_dev->guests_lock used to lock the guest during assignment of >> adapters and domains and the ap_perms_mutex locked by the AP bus when >> changes are made to the sysfs apmask/aqmask attributes. >> >> The AP Perms lock controls access to the objects that store the adapter >> numbers (ap_perms) and domain numbers (aq_perms) for the sysfs >> /sys/bus/ap/apmask and /sys/bus/ap/aqmask attributes. These attributes >> identify which queues are reserved for the zcrypt default device >> drivers. >> Before allowing a bit to be removed from either mask, the AP bus must >> check >> with the vfio_ap device driver to verify that none of the queues are >> assigned to any of its mediated devices. >> >> The apmask/aqmask attributes can be written or read at any time from >> userspace, so care must be taken to prevent a deadlock with asynchronous >> operations that might be taking place in the vfio_ap device driver. For >> example, consider the following: >> >> 1. A system administrator assigns an adapter to a mediated device >> under the >>     control of the vfio_ap device driver. The driver will need to >> first take >>     the matrix_dev->guests_lock to potentially hot plug the adapter into >>     the KVM guest. >> 2. At the same time, a system administrator sets a bit in the sysfs >>     /sys/bus/ap/ap_mask attribute. To complete the operation, the AP bus >>     must: >>     a. Take the ap_perms_mutex lock to update the object storing the >> values >>        for the /sys/bus/ap/ap_mask attribute. >>     b. Call the vfio_ap device driver's in-use callback to verify >> that the >>        queues now being reserved for the default zcrypt drivers are not >>        assigned to a mediated device owned by the vfio_ap device >> driver. To >>        do the verification, the in-use callback function takes the >>        matrix_dev->guests_lock, but has to wait because it is already >> held >>        by the operation in 1 above. >> 3. The vfio_ap device driver calls an AP bus function to verify that the >>     new queues resulting from the assignment of the adapter in step 1 >> are >>     not reserved for the default zcrypt device driver. This AP bus >> function >>     tries to take the ap_perms_mutex lock but gets stuck waiting for the >>     waiting for the lock due to step 2a above. >> >> Consequently, we have the following deadlock situation: >> >> matrix_dev->guests_lock locked (1) >> ap_perms_mutex lock locked (2a) >> Waiting for matrix_dev->gusts_lock (2b) which is currently held (1) >> Waiting for ap_perms_mutex lock (3) which is currently held (2a) >> >> To prevent this deadlock scenario, the function called in step 3 will no >> longer take the ap_perms_mutex lock and require the caller to take the >> lock. The lock will be the first taken by the adapter/domain assignment >> functions in the vfio_ap device driver to maintain the proper locking >> order. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak >> --- >>   drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c          | 31 ++++++++---- >>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c     |  1 + >>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c     | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h |  2 + >>   4 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c >> index fdf16cb70881..f48552e900a2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c >> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c >> @@ -817,6 +817,17 @@ static void ap_bus_revise_bindings(void) >>       bus_for_each_dev(&ap_bus_type, NULL, NULL, __ap_revise_reserved); >>   } >>   +/** >> + * ap_apqn_in_matrix_owned_by_def_drv: indicates whether an APQN c >> is reserved >> + *                       for the host drivers or not. >> + * @card: the APID of the adapter card to check >> + * @queue: the APQI of the queue to check >> + * >> + * Note: the ap_perms_mutex must be locked by the caller of this >> function. >> + * >> + * Return: an int specifying whether the APQN is reserved for the >> host (1) or >> + *       not (0) >> + */ > > Comment's function name does not match real function name. Also APQN > "c", from > description does not appear to exist. No, it definitely does not match and the 'c' is an extraneous typo. I'll fix both. > > > >>   int ap_owned_by_def_drv(int card, int queue) >>   { >>       int rc = 0; >> @@ -824,25 +835,31 @@ int ap_owned_by_def_drv(int card, int queue) >>       if (card < 0 || card >= AP_DEVICES || queue < 0 || queue >= >> AP_DOMAINS) >>           return -EINVAL; >>   -    mutex_lock(&ap_perms_mutex); >> - >>       if (test_bit_inv(card, ap_perms.apm) >>           && test_bit_inv(queue, ap_perms.aqm)) >>           rc = 1; >>   -    mutex_unlock(&ap_perms_mutex); >> - >>       return rc; >>   } >>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(ap_owned_by_def_drv); >>   +/** >> + * ap_apqn_in_matrix_owned_by_def_drv: indicates whether every APQN >> contained in >> + *                       a set is reserved for the host drivers >> + *                       or not. >> + * @apm: a bitmap specifying a set of APIDs comprising the APQNs to >> check >> + * @aqm: a bitmap specifying a set of APQIs comprising the APQNs to >> check >> + * >> + * Note: the ap_perms_mutex must be locked by the caller of this >> function. >> + * >> + * Return: an int specifying whether each APQN is reserved for the >> host (1) or >> + *       not (0) >> + */ >>   int ap_apqn_in_matrix_owned_by_def_drv(unsigned long *apm, >>                          unsigned long *aqm) >>   { >>       int card, queue, rc = 0; >>   -    mutex_lock(&ap_perms_mutex); >> - >>       for (card = 0; !rc && card < AP_DEVICES; card++) >>           if (test_bit_inv(card, apm) && >>               test_bit_inv(card, ap_perms.apm)) >> @@ -851,8 +868,6 @@ int ap_apqn_in_matrix_owned_by_def_drv(unsigned >> long *apm, >>                       test_bit_inv(queue, ap_perms.aqm)) >>                       rc = 1; >>   -    mutex_unlock(&ap_perms_mutex); >> - >>       return rc; >>   } >>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(ap_apqn_in_matrix_owned_by_def_drv); >> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c >> b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c >> index c258e5f7fdfc..2c3084589347 100644 >> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c >> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c >> @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group >> vfio_queue_attr_group = { >>   static struct ap_driver vfio_ap_drv = { >>       .probe = vfio_ap_mdev_probe_queue, >>       .remove = vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue, >> +    .in_use = vfio_ap_mdev_resource_in_use, >>       .ids = ap_queue_ids, >>   }; >>   diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c >> b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c >> index 49ed54dc9e05..3ece2cd9f1e7 100644 >> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c >> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c >> @@ -902,6 +902,21 @@ static int >> vfio_ap_mdev_verify_no_sharing(unsigned long *mdev_apm, >>       return 0; >>   } >>   +/** >> + * vfio_ap_mdev_validate_masks - verify that the APQNs assigned to >> the mdev are >> + *                 not reserved for the default zcrypt driver and >> + *                 are not assigned to another mdev. >> + * >> + * @matrix_mdev: the mdev to which the APQNs being validated are >> assigned. >> + * >> + * Return: One of the following values: >> + * o the error returned from the >> ap_apqn_in_matrix_owned_by_def_drv() function, >> + *   most likely -EBUSY indicating the ap_perms_mutex lock is >> already held. >> + * o EADDRNOTAVAIL if an APQN assigned to @matrix_mdev is reserved >> for the >> + *           zcrypt default driver. >> + * o EADDRINUSE if an APQN assigned to @matrix_mdev is assigned to >> another mdev >> + * o A zero indicating validation succeeded. >> + */ >>   static int vfio_ap_mdev_validate_masks(struct ap_matrix_mdev >> *matrix_mdev) >>   { >>       if (ap_apqn_in_matrix_owned_by_def_drv(matrix_mdev->matrix.apm, >> @@ -951,6 +966,10 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_link_adapter(struct >> ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev, >>    *       An APQN derived from the cross product of the APID being >> assigned >>    *       and the APQIs previously assigned is being used by another >> mediated >>    *       matrix device >> + * >> + *    5. -EAGAIN >> + *       A lock required to validate the mdev's AP configuration >> could not >> + *       be obtained. >>    */ >>   static ssize_t assign_adapter_store(struct device *dev, >>                       struct device_attribute *attr, >> @@ -961,6 +980,7 @@ static ssize_t assign_adapter_store(struct device >> *dev, >>       DECLARE_BITMAP(apm_delta, AP_DEVICES); >>       struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>   +    mutex_lock(&ap_perms_mutex); >>       get_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev); >>         ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &apid); >> @@ -991,6 +1011,7 @@ static ssize_t assign_adapter_store(struct >> device *dev, >>       ret = count; >>   done: >>       release_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev); >> +    mutex_unlock(&ap_perms_mutex); >>         return ret; >>   } >> @@ -1144,6 +1165,10 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_link_domain(struct >> ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev, >>    *       An APQN derived from the cross product of the APQI being >> assigned >>    *       and the APIDs previously assigned is being used by another >> mediated >>    *       matrix device >> + * >> + *    5. -EAGAIN >> + *       The lock required to validate the mdev's AP configuration >> could not >> + *       be obtained. >>    */ >>   static ssize_t assign_domain_store(struct device *dev, >>                      struct device_attribute *attr, >> @@ -1154,6 +1179,7 @@ static ssize_t assign_domain_store(struct >> device *dev, >>       DECLARE_BITMAP(aqm_delta, AP_DOMAINS); >>       struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>   +    mutex_lock(&ap_perms_mutex); >>       get_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev); >>         ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &apqi); >> @@ -1184,6 +1210,7 @@ static ssize_t assign_domain_store(struct >> device *dev, >>       ret = count; >>   done: >>       release_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev); >> +    mutex_unlock(&ap_perms_mutex); >>         return ret; >>   } >> @@ -1868,3 +1895,44 @@ void vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue(struct >> ap_device *apdev) >>       kfree(q); >>       release_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev); >>   } >> + >> +/** >> + * vfio_ap_mdev_resource_in_use: check whether any of a set of APQNs is >> + *                 assigned to a mediated device under the control >> + *                 of the vfio_ap device driver. >> + * >> + * @apm: a bitmap specifying a set of APIDs comprising the APQNs to >> check. >> + * @aqm: a bitmap specifying a set of APQIs comprising the APQNs to >> check. >> + * >> + * This function is invoked by the AP bus when changes to the >> apmask/aqmask >> + * attributes will result in giving control of the queue devices >> specified via >> + * @apm and @aqm to the default zcrypt device driver. Prior to >> calling this >> + * function, the AP bus locks the ap_perms_mutex. If this function >> is called >> + * while an adapter or domain is being assigned to a mediated >> device, the >> + * assignment operations will take the matrix_dev->guests_lock and >> + * matrix_dev->mdevs_lock then call the >> ap_apqn_in_matrix_owned_by_def_drv >> + * function, which also locks the ap_perms_mutex. This could result >> in a >> + * deadlock. >> + * >> + * To avoid a deadlock, this function will verify that the >> + * matrix_dev->guests_lock and matrix_dev->mdevs_lock are not >> currently held and >> + * will return -EBUSY if the locks can not be obtained. > > This part of the comment does not seem to match reality. Unless I'm > missing > something? Did you mean to call mutex_trylock? Or is the comment stale? The comment was written prior to the changes introduced to avoid the locking dependency (i.e., taking the ap_perms_mutex lock by the assignment functions which I believe was your suggestion). I shall remove the comment. > >> + * Return: >> + *    * -EBUSY if the locks required by this function are already >> locked. >> + *    * -EADDRINUSE if one or more of the APQNs specified via >> @apm/@aqm are >> + *      assigned to a mediated device under the control of the vfio_ap >> + *      device driver. >> + */ >> +int vfio_ap_mdev_resource_in_use(unsigned long *apm, unsigned long >> *aqm) >> +{ >> +    int ret; >> + >> +    mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->guests_lock); >> +    mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock); >> +    ret = vfio_ap_mdev_verify_no_sharing(apm, aqm); >> +    mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock); >> +    mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->guests_lock); >> + >> +    return ret; >> +} >> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h >> b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h >> index 6d4ca39f783b..cbffa0bd01da 100644 >> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h >> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h >> @@ -147,4 +147,6 @@ void vfio_ap_mdev_unregister(void); >>   int vfio_ap_mdev_probe_queue(struct ap_device *queue); >>   void vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue(struct ap_device *queue); >>   +int vfio_ap_mdev_resource_in_use(unsigned long *apm, unsigned long >> *aqm); >> + >>   #endif /* _VFIO_AP_PRIVATE_H_ */ > >