Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Mon, 6 Jun 2022 11:54:35 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc:     Jonathan McDowell <noodles@fb.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/kexec: Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec
Message-ID: <Yp16e5hMphomr2+H@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
References: <YmKyvlF3my1yWTvK@noodles-fedora-PC23Y6EG>
 <YmgjXZphkmDKgaOA@noodles-fedora-PC23Y6EG>
 <YnuJCH75GrhVm0Tp@noodles-fedora.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
 <Yn01Cfb3Divf49g7@noodles-fedora.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
 <8634d4dd0813b9522f039ed211023c2c65c6f888.camel@linux.ibm.com>
 <YpSC4AQInLM73wex@noodles-fedora.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
 <e7758ed1-5dcb-80dd-092a-a6bb21c3997d@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e7758ed1-5dcb-80dd-092a-a6bb21c3997d@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 06/03/22 at 08:55am, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 5/30/22 01:40, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > Borislav,
> > 
> > I don't think there are any outstanding review comments for me to deal
> > with on this, so is it safe to assume it'll get picked up at some point
> > once the merge window calms down?
> 
> Nothing here looks too crazy, but it's still been _very_ lightly
> reviewed.  It doesn't seem like anyone from the kexec world has seen it,
> for instance.
> 
> Mimi's review was a great start, but it would be really nice to make
> sure that the kexec bits look good.

The change looks good from kexec/kdump side. Not sure if Eric has
any concern.