Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>,
        Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
        Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com>,
        Liang Chen <cl@rock-chips.com>,
        Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Relax BASE protocol sanity checks on protocol list
Date:   Mon,  6 Jun 2022 15:51:06 +0100
Message-Id: <165452690983.3957918.16899232286285510282.b4-ty@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220523171559.472112-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
References: <20220523171559.472112-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:15:59 +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Even though malformed replies from firmware must be treated carefully to
> avoid memory corruption Kernel side, some out-of-spec SCMI replies can
> be tolerated to avoid breaking existing deployed system, as long as they
> won't cause memory issues.
>

Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi), thanks!

[1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Relax BASE protocol sanity checks on protocol list
      https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/122839b58a

--
Regards,
Sudeep