Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764102AbXESUCz (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 May 2007 16:02:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759335AbXESUCs (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 May 2007 16:02:48 -0400 Received: from pool-72-92-171-78.albyny.east.verizon.net ([72.92.171.78]:50657 "EHLO posidon.tmr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759307AbXESUCs (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 May 2007 16:02:48 -0400 Message-ID: <464F57DD.2000309@tmr.com> Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 16:02:37 -0400 From: Bill Davidsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070221 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel M/L Subject: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1070 Lines: 22 I generated a table of results from the latest glitch1 script, using an HTML postprocessor I not *quite* ready to foist on the word. In any case it has some numbers for frames per second, fairness of the processor time allocated to the compute bound processes which generate a lot of other screen activity for X, and my subjective comments on how smooth it looked and felt. The chart is at http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/sched_smooth_01.html for your viewing pleasure. The only "tuned" result was with sd, since what I observed was so bad using the default settings. If any scheduler developers would like me to try other tunings or new versions let me know. -- Bill Davidsen "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/