Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764703AbXESU4G (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 May 2007 16:56:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764215AbXESUzy (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 May 2007 16:55:54 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.173]:5718 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762329AbXESUzx convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 May 2007 16:55:53 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=UdyG+OOuatCpgEDozxk6QFMS/C9ULmMJppEljbzD7YtGzA4sW+agSSkZIQ51xhHgM3CVzHeq66D1AZkE/YIxanlCYQZm0Y3Ha6d3rnf7jZnG+kx5q1xWfMSgbS2Cg++wqjA+zM6j5sa2PQ2CxHjU7ZDmnX9OgrZgb7tE4qz9zBI= Message-ID: <2c0942db0705191355x740bf664ud36c3cc4b39d210f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 13:55:52 -0700 From: "Ray Lee" To: "Diego Calleja" Subject: Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48 Cc: "Bill Davidsen" , "Linux Kernel M/L" In-Reply-To: <20070519223603.8d70cd6e.diegocg@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <464F57DD.2000309@tmr.com> <20070519223603.8d70cd6e.diegocg@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 31aabbf5c3b109cd Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1165 Lines: 23 On 5/19/07, Diego Calleja wrote: > El Sat, 19 May 2007 16:02:37 -0400, Bill Davidsen escribi?: > > > The chart is at http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/sched_smooth_01.html for > > your viewing pleasure. The only "tuned" result was with sd, since what I > > observed was so bad using the default settings. If any scheduler > > developers would like me to try other tunings or new versions let me know. > > How useful is glxgears as benchmark here? The X.org people has been saying > for ages that "glxgears is not a benchmark". If you hold everything in the system constant other than the scheduler, then it's a useful measure of the effects the scheduler has upon glxgears, regardless of how well or poorly written it might be. I suspect the X.org people are correct in regards how most people would try to use it, which would be measurements against different video cards, CPUs, etc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/