Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 7 Jun 2022 09:45:55 -0700
From:   Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
CC:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
        Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: add a quirk to disable FUA support
Message-ID: <20220607164555.GA30890@asutoshd-linux1.qualcomm.com>
References: <20220531201053.3300018-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
 <YpZ71MU7+DRedq5S@gmail.com>
 <YpaATWTiipNERoVF@google.com>
 <YpaHwds1zYRwua3+@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YpaHwds1zYRwua3+@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 31 2022 at 14:25 -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
>On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 01:53:33PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> > Also, this patch does nothing by itself.  Which UFS host driver(s) need this
>> > quirk bit?  Can you update them to use it?  Or do they all need this, in which
>> > case a quirk bit would be unnecessary?
>>
>> Likewise other quick bits, using this is up to SoC or UFS vendors. I
>> think that combination is up to OEMs who is building the product.
>
>Of the UFS host drivers in the upstream kernel, which ones actually need this?
>

Qualcomm UFSHC would need this.
>- Eric