Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:43:49 +0200
From:   Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To:     Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
        Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
        Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
        linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] bitops: define gen_test_bit() the same way as the
 rest of functions
Message-ID: <Yp9WFREfdfkho0hm@elver.google.com>
References: <20220606114908.962562-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
 <20220606114908.962562-4-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220606114908.962562-4-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/2.1.4 (2021-12-11)
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 01:49PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Currently, the generic test_bit() function is defined as a one-liner
> and in case with constant bitmaps the compiler is unable to optimize
> it to a constant. At the same time, gen_test_and_*_bit() are being
> optimized pretty good.
> Define gen_test_bit() the same way as they are defined.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
> ---
>  include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h b/include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h
> index 7a60adfa6e7d..202d8a3b40e1 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h
> @@ -118,7 +118,11 @@ gen___test_and_change_bit(unsigned int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
>  static __always_inline int
>  gen_test_bit(unsigned int nr, const volatile unsigned long *addr)
>  {
> -	return 1UL & (addr[BIT_WORD(nr)] >> (nr & (BITS_PER_LONG-1)));
> +	const unsigned long *p = (const unsigned long *)addr + BIT_WORD(nr);
> +	unsigned long mask = BIT_MASK(nr);
> +	unsigned long val = *p;
> +
> +	return !!(val & mask);

Unfortunately this makes the dereference of 'addr' non-volatile, and
effectively weakens test_bit() to the point where I'd no longer consider
it atomic. Per atomic_bitops.txt, test_bit() is atomic.

The generic version has been using a volatile access to make it atomic
(akin to generic READ_ONCE() casting to volatile). The volatile is also
the reason the compiler can't optimize much, because volatile forces a
real memory access.

Yes, confusingly, test_bit() lives in non-atomic.h, and this had caused
confusion before, but the decision was made that moving it will cause
headaches for ppc so it was left alone:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/87a78xgu8o.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net/T/#u

As for how to make test_bit() more compiler-optimization friendly, I'm
guessing that test_bit() needs some special casing where even the
generic arch_test_bit() is different from the gen_test_bit().
gen_test_bit() should probably assert that whatever it is called with
can actually be evaluated at compile-time so it is never accidentally
used otherwise.

I would also propose adding a comment close to the deref that test_bit()
is atomic and the deref needs to remain volatile, so future people will
not try to do the same optimization.

Thanks,
-- Marco