Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Tue, 7 Jun 2022 14:07:31 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     20220515233047.531979-3-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz
Cc:     robh+dt@kernel.org,
        Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        will@kernel.org, gregory.clement@bootlin.com,
        sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, kostap@marvell.com,
        robert.marko@sartura.hr, vadym.kochan@plvision.eu,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] arm64: dts: marvell: Add Armada 98DX2530 SoC and
 RD-AC5X board
Message-ID: <Yp8/g0m0xWiRmOq9@lunn.ch>
References: <20220515233047.531979-3-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
 <20220607114936.GA18404@plvision.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220607114936.GA18404@plvision.eu>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 02:49:36PM +0300, Vadym Kochan wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/Makefile          |   1 +
> > .../boot/dts/marvell/armada-98dx25xx.dtsi     | 297 ++++++++++++++++++
> > .../boot/dts/marvell/armada-98dx35xx-rd.dts   | 101 ++++++
> > .../boot/dts/marvell/armada-98dx35xx.dtsi     |  13 +
> 
> There is a proposal from the Marvell to replace "armada-" prefix to "ac5-" in DTS naming as there
> is no much common with Armada SoC's.

O.K. We can do this. But i hope it is not Marvell being lazy.

I can also see an advantage of using armada-, since it makes it clear
we are talking about mainline device tree files, not Marvell vendor
device tree files. It is not given they will be compatible.

       Andrew